ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2014
Gender and Age Differences in Short- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of Nomogram to Predict Long-Term Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.International journal of general medicine · 2021Article
- Novel insights into clinical characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in Vietnam.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2020Article
- Baseline Hemoglobin Levels Associated with One-Year Mortality in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2016Article
- Activin A Predicts Left Ventricular Remodeling and Mortality in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2016Article
- Diabetes and Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome - Data from Taiwan's Acute Coronary Syndrome Full Spectrum Data Registry.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudies have reported that women with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have worse short- and long-term outcomes than men. It has not yet been confirmed whether these differences reflect differences in age between men and women.
methodsWe retrospectively enrolled 1035 consecutive STEMI patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Baseline clinical characteristics, coronary anatomy, and outcome were compared between young (< 65 years old) and older patients (≥ 65 years old) of both sexes.
resultsYounger women presented with a lower incidence of typical angina (83% vs. 93%, p = 0.03), single-vessel disease (21% vs. 35%, p = 0.03), and total occlusion of infarct-related artery (65% vs. 83%, p = 0.001) than younger men, with no gender difference noted in the older group. Younger women in the study had a higher incidence of reinfarction, heart failure requiring admission, or mortality (23% vs. 6%, p < 0.001) during follow-up, compared with younger men, with no gender difference in the older group. Using the Kaplan-Meier analysis, younger women had lower rates of event-free survival (p < 0.001 by log-rank test) than younger men, with no gender difference in the older group. In multivariate analysis, age could predict long-term outcome in men (Hazard ratio 4.43, 95% confidence interval: 2.89-6.78, p < 0.001) but not in women.
conclusionsIn STEMI patients receiving primary PCI, sex-related long-term outcome differences were age-dependent, with younger women likely to have a worse long-term outcome when compared with younger men. KEY WORDS: Coronary heart disease; Gender; Myocardial infarction.
Identifiers
27122800PMC4804989What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.