Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27122739›Full record

ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2013

Increased Rosuvastatin Dose versus Concomitant Fenofibrate and Rosuvastatin Therapy to Achieve Lipid Goal in Patients with Diabetes or Atherosclerosis with Metabolic Syndrome.

Yeh-Peng Chen, Kuan-Cheng Chang, Wei-Kung Tseng, Wei-Hsian Yin, Jaw-Wen Chen, Yuan-Teh Lee, Chau-Chung Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fibrates for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease events.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016 · on this map
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yeh-Peng ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan;
Kuan-Cheng ChangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan;
Wei-Kung TsengDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan;
Wei-Hsian YinDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cheng-Hsin General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;
Jaw-Wen ChenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;
Yuan-Teh LeeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan; ; Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Primary Care Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chau-Chung WuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Primary Care Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWCheng Hsin General Hospital · TWE-Da Hospital · TWTaipei Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

puposeWe aimed to ascertain whether increased rosuvastatin dose is non-inferior to concomitant fenofibrate and rosuvastatin therapy in patients with diabetes or atherosclerosis with metabolic syndrome.

methodsAfter treatment with rosuvastatin 5 mg/day for 12 weeks, 112 patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/day rosuvastatin (group A) or 80 mg/day supra-film coated fenofibrate plus 5 mg/day rosuvastatin (group B). The therapy effects were evaluated by measuring the serum lipid profile, liver and muscle enzymes, and renal function after the treatment period.

resultsAfter the treatment, the total cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non HDL-C, low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglyceride were comparable between the 2 groups. The change in the non-HDL-C were -7.39 ± 26.58 (-6.62%) and -0.68 ± 24.49 (-1.19%) mg/dl (p = 0.28); and the change in the triglyceride were -36.61 ± 62.51 (-14.00%) and -44.77 ± 77.35 (-23.17%) mg/dl (p = 0.64), respectively. While 41.37% of group A and 38.69% of group B achieved their LDL-C goal (< 100 mg/dl) (p = 0.79), 37.26% of group A and 42.31% of group B achieved their triglyceride goal (< 150 mg/dl) (p = 0.53), respectively. The changes in the serum transaminase and creatinine phosphokinase were similar between the 2 groups.

conclusionsAfter 5 mg/day of rosuvastatin, the lipid profile in patients with diabetes or atherosclerotic vascular diseases with metabolic syndrome could be improved by increasing rosuvastatin dose, and the resultant decrease of non-HDL and triglyceride were similar to those obtained with combination therapy. Both therapies were safe and feasible. KEY WORDS: Combination therapy; Diabetes; Fenofibrate; Metabolic syndrome; Monotherapy; Statin.

Identifiers

PMID27122739
PMCPMC4804791
OpenAlexW2171221592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.