ReviewActa Cardiologica Sinica2013
Gene Therapy for Cardiac Arrhythmias.
Review in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The emerging role of calsequestrin 2: from calcium sensor and modulator to arrhythmia driver.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2026Review
- Complete Fetal Atrioventricular Block Associated with Maternal Autoinflammatory Diseases: Case Report and Literature Review.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2020Article
- Transcatheter Cryoablation Procedures without Fluoroscopy in Pediatric Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia: A Single-Center Experience.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledMorbidity and mortality caused by cardiac arrhythmias are a major issue in developed countries. Although conventional therapeutic options including pharmacological therapy, catheter ablation, and implantable devices have shown extensive advances to help reduce morbidity and mortality, a certain segment of these arrhythmias is still refractory to treatment. Therefore, gene therapy was explored as a potential additional or alternative therapy. Gene therapy trials have been developed for bradycardia, atrial fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia. For the treatment of bradycardia, "biological pacemaker" attempts have been examined utilizing virus vectors to eliminate inward rectifier potassium current, or to overexpress the If current to convert quiescent myocytes into spontaneously active cells. These gene therapy attempts were soon followed by gene and cell hybrid therapies, and cell transplantation therapies utilizing pacemaker cells derived from stem cells. For the treatment of tachycardia, two major strategies were conceived: 1) to increase the effective refractory period, or 2) to recover the conduction velocity. The establishment of a selective and highly efficient gene transfer method would enable us to apply these concepts into the atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia models. Both concepts resulted in an elimination or reduction of tachyarrhythmias in large animal models. Although these trials proved the concept of gene therapy as an adjuvant or alternative approach for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, the limitation of these studies is the long-term efficacy and safety. Consequently, an improvement in the gene delivery method is required to overcome these issues. KEY WORDS: Atrial fibrillation; Biological pacemaker; Gene therapy; Ion channel; Ventricular tachycardia.
Identifiers
27122711PMC4804834W2267713842What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.