Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27122635›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2016

Cellular Dynamics of Mouse Trophoblast Stem Cells: Identification of a Persistent Stem Cell Type.

Kaori Motomura, Mami Oikawa, Michiko Hirose, Arata Honda, Sumie Togayachi, Hiroyuki Miyoshi, Yasuhide Ohinata, Michihiko Sugimoto, Kuniya Abe, Kimiko Inoue and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Kaori MotomuraRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Mami OikawaRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
Michiko HiroseRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
Arata HondaRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan Organization for Promotion of Tenure Track, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
Sumie TogayachiRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
Hiroyuki MiyoshiDepartment of Physiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhide OhinataFaculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan.
Michihiko SugimotoRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kuniya AbeRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Kimiko InoueRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.
Atsuo OguraRIKEN BioResource Center, Tsukuba, Japan Graduate School of Life and Environmental Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan The Center for Disease Biology and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan ogura@rtc.riken.go.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse trophoblast stem cells (TSCs) proliferate indefinitely in vitro, despite their highly heterogeneous nature. In this study, we sought to characterize TSC colony types by using methods based on cell biology and biochemistry for a better understanding of how TSCs are maintained over multiple passages. Colonies of TSCs could be classified into four major types: type 1 is compact and dome-shaped, type 4 is flattened but with a large multilayered cell cluster, and types 2 and 3 are their intermediates. A time-lapse analysis indicated that type 1 colonies predominantly appeared after passaging, and a single type 1 colony gave rise to all other types. These colony transitions were irreversible, but at least some type 1 colonies persisted throughout culture. The typical cells comprising type 1 colonies were small and highly motile, and they aggregated together to form primary colonies. A hierarchical clustering based on global gene expression profiles suggested that a TSC line containing more type 1 colony cells was similar to in vivo extraembryonic tissues. Among the known TSC genes examined, Elf5 showed a differential expression pattern according to colony type, indicating that this gene might be a reliable marker of undifferentiated TSCs. When aggregated with fertilized embryos, cells from types 1 and 2, but not from type 4, distributed to the polar trophectoderm in blastocysts. These findings indicate that cells typically found in type 1 colonies can persist indefinitely as stem cells and are responsible for the maintenance of TSC lines. They may provide key information for future improvements in the quality of TSC lines.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleMaleMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred DBAStem CellsTranscription FactorsTrophoblastsDNA-Binding ProteinsElf5 protein, mouseTranscription Factorsmouseplacentatrophoblast stem cell

Identifiers

PMID27122635
PMCPMC6702784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.