Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27122602›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2016

Dynamic myosin activation promotes collective morphology and migration by locally balancing oppositional forces from surrounding tissue.

George Aranjuez, Ashley Burtscher, Ketki Sawant, Pralay Majumder, Jocelyn A McDonald

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Collective migration modes in development, tissue repair and cancer.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Actomyosin contraction in the follicular epithelium provides the major mechanical force for follicle rupture duringProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Finishing the egg.Genetics · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

George AranjuezDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Ashley BurtscherDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195.
Ketki SawantDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506.
Pralay MajumderDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 pralay.dbs@presiuniv.ac.in jmcdona@ksu.edu.
Jocelyn A McDonaldDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195 Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106 Division of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506 pralay.dbs@presiuniv.ac.in jmcdona@ksu.edu.
Kansas State University · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USPresidency University · INUniversity of Central Florida · US

Funding

Regulation of in vivo cell migration by the polarity protein Par-1R01GM078526 · NIGMS · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MCDONALD, JOCELYN A · 2008 to 2012
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078526
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migrating cells need to overcome physical constraints from the local microenvironment to navigate their way through tissues. Cells that move collectively have the additional challenge of negotiating complex environments in vivo while maintaining cohesion of the group as a whole. The mechanisms by which collectives maintain a migratory morphology while resisting physical constraints from the surrounding tissue are poorly understood. Drosophila border cells represent a genetic model of collective migration within a cell-dense tissue. Border cells move as a cohesive group of 6-10 cells, traversing a network of large germ line-derived nurse cells within the ovary. Here we show that the border cell cluster is compact and round throughout their entire migration, a shape that is maintained despite the mechanical pressure imposed by the surrounding nurse cells. Nonmuscle myosin II (Myo-II) activity at the cluster periphery becomes elevated in response to increased constriction by nurse cells. Furthermore, the distinctive border cell collective morphology requires highly dynamic and localized enrichment of Myo-II. Thus, activated Myo-II promotes cortical tension at the outer edge of the migrating border cell cluster to resist compressive forces from nurse cells. We propose that dynamic actomyosin tension at the periphery of collectives facilitates their movement through restrictive tissues.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActomyosinAnimalsCell MovementCell ShapeCellular MicroenvironmentDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsFemaleMyosinsMyosin Type IIOogenesisSignal TransductionActomyosinDrosophila ProteinsMyosinsMyosin Type II

Identifiers

PMID27122602
PMCPMC4907723
OpenAlexW2345093476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.