Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27122485›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2016

Parenteral Vaccination Can Be an Effective Means of Inducing Protective Mucosal Responses.

John D Clements, Lucy C Freytag

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Diagnosis, Management, and Future Control of Cholera.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mucosal immunity to poliovirus.Mucosal immunology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Rotavirus Vaccine Landscape, an Update.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John D ClementsDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA jclemen@tulane.edu.
Lucy C FreytagDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
Tulane University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current paradigm in vaccine development is that nonreplicating vaccines delivered parenterally fail to induce immune responses in mucosal tissues. However, both clinical and experimental data have challenged this concept, and numerous studies have shown that induction of mucosal immune responses after parenteral vaccination is not a rare occurrence and might, in fact, significantly contribute to the protection against mucosal infections afforded by parenteral vaccines. While the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are not well understood, the realization that parenteral vaccination can be an effective means of inducing protective mucosal responses is paradigm-shifting and has potential to transform the way vaccines are designed and delivered.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalAdjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsBacterial InfectionsHumansInjections, SubcutaneousMiceVaccinationVaccinesVirus DiseasesAdjuvants, ImmunologicVaccines

Identifiers

PMID27122485
PMCPMC4895008
OpenAlexW2344307725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.