Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27122469›Full record

Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2016

Inequalities in use of total hip arthroplasty for hip fracture: population based study.

Daniel C Perry, David Metcalfe, Xavier L Griffin, Matthew L Costa

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel C PerryInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK danperry@liverpool.ac.uk.
David MetcalfeCentre for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Xavier L GriffinNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, The Kadoorie Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Matthew L CostaNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, The Kadoorie Centre, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
University of Oxford · GBHarvard University · USUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Department of Health CS-2014-14-012Department of Health RP-DG-1210-10022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether the use of total hip arthroplasty (THA) among individuals with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck is based on national guidelines or if there are systematic inequalities.

designObservational cohort study using the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD).

settingAll hospitals that treat adults with hip fractures in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

participantsPatients within the national database (all aged ≥60) who received operative treatment for a non-pathological displaced intracapsular hip fracture from 1 July 2011 to 31 April 2015.

main outcome measuresProvision of THA to patients considered eligible under criteria published by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE).

results114 119 patients with hip fracture were included, 11 683 (10.2%) of whom underwent THA. Of those who satisfied the NICE criteria, 32% (6780) : received a THA. Of patients who underwent THA, 42% (4903) did not satisfy the NICE criteria. A recursive partitioning algorithm found that the NICE eligibility criteria did not optimally explain which patients underwent THA. A model with superior explanatory power drew distinctions that are not supported by NICE, which were an age cut off at 76 and a different ambulation cut off. Among patients who satisfied the NICE eligibility, the use of THA was less likely with higher age (odds ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 0.88), worsening abbreviated mental test scores (0.49 (0.41 to 0.58) for normal cognition v borderline cognitive impairment)), worsening American Society of Anesthesiologists score (0.74, 0.66 to 0.84), male sex (0.85, 0.77 to 0.93), worsening ambulatory status (0.32, 0.28 to 0.35 for walking with a stick v independent ambulation), and fifths of worsening socioeconomic area deprivation (0.76 (0.66 to 0.88) for least v most deprived fifth). Patients receiving treatment during the working week were more likely to receive THA than at the weekend (0.90, 0.83 to 0.98).

conclusionsThere are wide disparities in the use of THA among individuals with hip fractures, and compliance with NICE guidance is poor. Patients with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation and those who require surgery at the weekend were less likely to receive THA. Inconsistent compliance with NICE recommendations means that the optimal treatment for older adults with hip fractures can depend on where and when they present to hospital.

Indexed as

Socioeconomic FactorsAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCohort StudiesDatabases, FactualEnglandFemaleFemoral Neck FracturesGuidelines as TopicHealthcare DisparitiesHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNorthern Ireland

Identifiers

PMID27122469
PMCPMC4849171
OpenAlexW2277792773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.