Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121891›Full record

ArticlePain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2016

Development and Patient Satisfaction of a New Telemedicine Service for Pain Management at Massachusetts General Hospital to the Island of Martha's Vineyard.

George M Hanna, Irina Fishman, David A Edwards, Shiqian Shen, Cheryl Kram, Xulei Liu, Matthew Shotwell, Christopher Gilligan

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Telemedicine and current clinical practice trends in the COVID-19 pandemic.Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Patient Autonomy and Quality of Care in Telehealthcare.Science and engineering ethics · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

George M Hanna*Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts ghanna2@mgh.harvard.edu.
Irina FishmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
David A EdwardsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Shiqian Shen*Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Center for Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Cheryl KramPain Management Center, Martha's Vineyard Hospital, Oak Bluffs, Massachusetts, USA.
Xulei LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Matthew ShotwellDepartment of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Christopher GilliganDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCenter for Pain and the Brain · USMartha's Vineyard Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Research Training for AnesthetistsT32GM007592 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI STUART A FORMAN · 1985 to 2026
$11.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePatients in remote areas lack access to specialist care and pain management services. In order to provide pain management care to patients remote from our center, we created a telemedicine pain clinic (telepain) at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) in Boston, MA to extend services to the Island of Martha's Vineyard.

designOver 13 months, 238 telepain video clinic evaluations were conducted. A pain physician visited the island 1-2 days per month and performed 121 interventions. Given the novelty of telemedicine clinics, we surveyed patients to gauge satisfaction and identify perceived weaknesses in our approach that could be addressed. Forty-nine consecutive patients answered a 14-question, 5-point balanced Likert-scale survey with 1 (no, definitely not) being most negative and 5 (yes, definitely) being most positive.

settingPatients on Martha's Vineyard referred for pain management consultation services via telemedicine. PATIENTS: Forty-nine consecutive patients evaluated via telemedicine.

interventionsLikert-scale survey administered. MEASURES: Questions measured patient impressions of video-based visits with their doctor, convenience of the visit, concerns about privacy, and whether they would recommend such a visit, among other items.

resultsMean respondent scores for each question were >4.3 indicating a favorable impression of the telepain clinic experience. Lowest mean scores were found when respondents were asked to compare the care they received by telepain versus an in-person visit, or whether they were able to develop a friendly relationship with the doctor.

conclusionsThe results suggest an overall positive reception of telepain by patients, yet highlight the challenge of building a patient-physician relationship remotely.

Indexed as

HumansMassachusettsPain ManagementPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicinePain ManagementPain MedicineTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID27121891
PMCPMC6281046
OpenAlexW2343546333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.