Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121869›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Co-creation of an ICT-supported cancer rehabilitation application for resected lung cancer survivors: design and evaluation.

Josien G Timmerman, Thijs M Tönis, Marit G H Dekker-van Weering, Martijn M Stuiver, Michel W J M Wouters, Wim H van Harten, Hermie J Hermens, Miriam M R Vollenbroek-Hutten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
14.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Co-Production Performance Evaluation in Healthcare. A Systematic Review of Methods, Tools and Metrics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Empowering Recovery: A Co-Designed Intervention to Transform Care for Operable Lung Cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Josien G TimmermanRoessingh Research and Development, Telemedicine group, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, Enschede, 7522 AH, The Netherlands. j.timmerman@rrd.nl.
Thijs M TönisRoessingh Research and Development, Telemedicine group, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, Enschede, 7522 AH, The Netherlands.
Marit G H Dekker-van WeeringRoessingh Research and Development, Telemedicine group, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, Enschede, 7522 AH, The Netherlands.
Martijn M StuiverThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel W J M WoutersThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wim H van HartenThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Hermie J HermensRoessingh Research and Development, Telemedicine group, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, Enschede, 7522 AH, The Netherlands.
Miriam M R Vollenbroek-HuttenRoessingh Research and Development, Telemedicine group, Roessinghsbleekweg 33b, Enschede, 7522 AH, The Netherlands.
Roessingh Research and Development · NLThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer (LC) patients experience high symptom burden and significant decline of physical fitness and quality of life following lung resection. Good quality of survivorship care post-surgery is essential to optimize recovery and prevent unscheduled healthcare use. The use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) can improve post-surgery care, as it enables frequent monitoring of health status in daily life, provides timely and personalized feedback to patients and professionals, and improves accessibility to rehabilitation programs. Despite its promises, implementation of telehealthcare applications is challenging, often hampered by non-acceptance of the developed service by its end-users. A promising approach is to involve the end-users early and continuously during the developmental process through a so-called user-centred design approach. The aim of this article is to report on this process of co-creation and evaluation of a multimodal ICT-supported cancer rehabilitation program with and for lung cancer patients treated with lung resection and their healthcare professionals (HCPs).

methodsA user-centered design approach was used. Through semi-structured interviews (n = 10 LC patients and 6 HCPs), focus groups (n = 5 HCPs), and scenarios (n = 5 HCPs), user needs and requirements were elicited. Semi-structured interviews and the System Usability Scale (SUS) were used to evaluate usability of the telehealthcare application with 7 LC patients and 10 HCPs.

resultsThe developed application consists of: 1) self-monitoring of symptoms and physical activity using on-body sensors and a smartphone, and 2) a web based physical exercise program. 71 % of LC patients and 78 % of HCPs were willing to use the application as part of lung cancer treatment. Accessibility of data via electronic patient records was essential for HCPs. LC patients regarded a positive attitude of the HCP towards the application essential. Overall, the usability (SUS median score = 70, range 35-95) was rated acceptable.

conclusionsA telehealthcare application that facilitates symptom monitoring and physical fitness training is considered a useful tool to further improve recovery following surgery of resected lung cancer (LC) patients. Involvement of end users in the design process appears to be necessary to optimize chances of adoption, compliance and implementation of telemedicine.

Indexed as

SurvivorsTelemedicineFemaleFocus GroupsFollow-Up StudiesHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care PlanningProgram DevelopmentProgram EvaluationQuality of LifeCancer survivorshipLung cancerRehabilitationTelehealthcareUser-centered design approach

Identifiers

PMID27121869
PMCPMC4848869
OpenAlexW2343839738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.