Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121688›Full record

ReviewLeukemia2016

European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management and avoidance of adverse events of treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia.

J L Steegmann, M Baccarani, M Breccia, L F Casado, V García-Gutiérrez, A Hochhaus, D-W Kim, T D Kim, H J Khoury, P Le Coutre and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 249 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
249citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
37.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

249 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 470 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

189 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

J L SteegmannServicio de Hematologia y Grupo 44 IIS-IP, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
M BaccaraniDepartment of Hematology and Oncology 'L. and A. Seràgnoli', St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
M BrecciaDepartment of Cellular Biotechnologies and Hematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
L F CasadoServicio de Hematologia, Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain.
V García-GutiérrezServicio Hematología y Hemoterapia, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
A HochhausHematology/Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany.
D-W KimSeoul St Mary's Hospital, Leukemia Research Institute, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
T D KimMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Onkologie und Hämatologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
H J KhouryDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
P Le CoutreMedizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Onkologie und Hämatologie, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J MayerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, Masaryk University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
D MilojkovicDepartment of Haematology Imperial College, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
K PorkkaDepartment of Hematology, Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland.
D ReaService d'Hématologie Adulte, Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Paris, France.
G RostiDepartment of Hematology and Oncology 'L. and A. Seràgnoli', St Orsola University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
S SausseleIII. Med. Klinik Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
R HehlmannMedizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
R E ClarkDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECatholic University of Korea · KREmory University · USHammersmith Hospital · GBHeidelberg University · DEHôpital Saint-Louis · FRHospital Universitario de La Princesa · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Virgen de la Salud · ESJena University Hospital · DEMedizinische Fakultät MannheimSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity Hospital Brno · CZUniversity of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most reports on chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) focus on efficacy, particularly on molecular response and outcome. In contrast, adverse events (AEs) are often reported as infrequent, minor, tolerable and manageable, but they are increasingly important as therapy is potentially lifelong and multiple TKIs are available. For this reason, the European LeukemiaNet panel for CML management recommendations presents an exhaustive and critical summary of AEs emerging during CML treatment, to assist their understanding, management and prevention. There are five major conclusions. First, the main purpose of CML treatment is the antileukemic effect. Suboptimal management of AEs must not compromise this first objective. Second, most patients will have AEs, usually early, mostly mild to moderate, and which will resolve spontaneously or are easily controlled by simple means. Third, reduction or interruption of treatment must only be done if optimal management of the AE cannot be accomplished in other ways, and frequent monitoring is needed to detect resolution of the AE as early as possible. Fourth, attention must be given to comorbidities and drug interactions, and to new events unrelated to TKIs that are inevitable during such a prolonged treatment. Fifth, some TKI-related AEs have emerged which were not predicted or detected in earlier studies, maybe because of suboptimal attention to or absence from the preclinical data. Overall, imatinib has demonstrated a good long-term safety profile, though recent findings suggest underestimation of symptom severity by physicians. Second and third generation TKIs have shown higher response rates, but have been associated with unexpected problems, some of which could be irreversible. We hope these recommendations will help to minimise adverse events, and we believe that an optimal management of them will be rewarded by better TKI compliance and thus better CML outcomes, together with better quality of life.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID27121688
PMCPMC4991363
OpenAlexW2343511371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.