Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121612›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Text mining for precision medicine: automating disease-mutation relationship extraction from biomedical literature.

Ayush Singhal, Michael Simmons, Zhiyong Lu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of Word Embeddings for Extraction from Medical Records.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Biomarker identification of hepatocellular carcinoma using a methodical literature mining strategy.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ayush SinghalNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Michael SimmonsNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Zhiyong LuNational Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA zhiyong.lu@nih.gov.
National Institutes of Health · USNational Center for Biotechnology Information · US

Funding

Named Entity Recognition and Relationship Extraction in BiomedicineZIALM091813 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI LU, ZHIYONG · 2013 to 2022
$13.4M
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentifying disease-mutation relationships is a significant challenge in the advancement of precision medicine. The aim of this work is to design a tool that automates the extraction of disease-related mutations from biomedical text to advance database curation for the support of precision medicine. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe developed a machine-learning (ML) based method to automatically identify the mutations mentioned in the biomedical literature related to a particular disease. In order to predict a relationship between the mutation and the target disease, several features, such as statistical features, distance features, and sentiment features, were constructed. Our ML model was trained with a pre-labeled dataset consisting of manually curated information about mutation-disease associations. The model was subsequently used to extract disease-related mutations from larger biomedical literature corpora.

resultsThe performance of the proposed approach was assessed using a benchmarking dataset. Results show that our proposed approach gains significant improvement over the previous state of the art and obtains F-measures of 0.880 and 0.845 for prostate and breast cancer mutations, respectively. DISCUSSION: To demonstrate its utility, we applied our approach to all abstracts in PubMed for 3 diseases (including a non-cancer disease). The mutations extracted were then manually validated against human-curated databases. The validation results show that the proposed approach is useful in a real-world setting to extract uncurated disease mutations from the biomedical literature.

conclusionsThe proposed approach improves the state of the art for mutation-disease extraction from text. It is scalable and generalizable to identify mutations for any disease at a PubMed scale.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMutationPrecision MedicineBreast NeoplasmsComputational BiologyDatabases as TopicData MiningFemaleHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsPubMedautomated extractionbreast cancerdisease-mutation relationshipmachine learningprecision medicineprostate cancertext mining

Identifiers

PMID27121612
PMCPMC4926749
OpenAlexW2344539657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.