Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121608›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Core informatics competencies for clinical and translational scientists: what do our customers and collaborators need to know?

Annette L Valenta, Emma A Meagher, Umberto Tachinardi, Justin Starren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical Decision Support Systems.Visceral medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Focusing on informatics education.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Annette L ValentaDepartment of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Emma A MeagherPerelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Umberto TachinardiSchool of Medical and Public Health Office of the Dean, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Justin StarrenDivision of Health and Biomedical Informatics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA Justin.Starren@northwestern.edu.

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2012 to 2015
$38.9M
Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science (MCTS) Program (UL1)UL1TR000150 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LLOYD-JONES, DONALD M · 2012 to 2013
$10.1M
Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR000050 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI AZAR, DIMITRI T, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2012 to 2014
$9.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000003NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000050NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000150NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the inception of the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program in 2006, leaders in education across CTSA sites have been developing and updating core competencies for Clinical and Translational Science (CTS) trainees. By 2009, 14 competency domains, including biomedical informatics, had been identified and published. Since that time, the evolution of the CTSA program, changes in the practice of CTS, the rapid adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), the growth of biomedical informatics, the explosion of big data, and the realization that some of the competencies had proven to be difficult to apply in practice have made it clear that the competencies should be updated. This paper describes the process undertaken and puts forth a new set of competencies that has been recently endorsed by the Clinical Research Informatics Workgroup of AMIA. In addition to providing context and background for the current version of the competencies, we hope this will serve as a model for revision of competencies over time.

Indexed as

CertificationProfessional CompetenceCurriculumEducation, GraduateMedical InformaticsSocieties, MedicalTranslational Research, BiomedicalUnited Stateseducationgraduateinformaticsprofessional competencetranslational medical research

Identifiers

PMID27121608
PMCPMC4926750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.