Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121585›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Taste coding of complex naturalistic taste stimuli and traditional taste stimuli in the parabrachial pons of the awake, freely licking rat.

Joshua D Sammons, Michael S Weiss, Jonathan D Victor, Patricia M Di Lorenzo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Parabrachial Nucleus Activity in Nociception and Pain in Awake Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  2. Parabrachial nucleus activity in nociception and pain in awake mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Central taste anatomy and physiology.Handbook of clinical neurology · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The Taste of Caffeine.Journal of caffeine research · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joshua D SammonsDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York; and.
Michael S WeissDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York; and.
Jonathan D VictorBrain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9293-0111
Patricia M Di LorenzoDepartment of Psychology, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York; and diloren@binghamton.edu.
Binghamton University · USCornell University · US

Funding

Temporal Coding in the Gustatory System of the BrainR01DC006914 · NIDCD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY,BINGHAMTON · PI DI LORENZO, PATRICIA M · 2006 to 2020
$5.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have shown that taste-responsive cells in the brainstem taste nuclei of rodents respond to sensory qualities other than gustation. Such data suggest that cells in the classical gustatory brainstem may be better tuned to respond to stimuli that engage multiple sensory modalities than to stimuli that are purely gustatory. Here, we test this idea by recording the electrophysiological responses to complex, naturalistic stimuli in single neurons in the parabrachial pons (PbN, the second neural relay in the central gustatory pathway) in awake, freely licking rats. Following electrode implantation and recovery, we presented both prototypical and naturalistic taste stimuli and recorded the responses in the PbN. Prototypical taste stimuli (NaCl, sucrose, citric acid, and caffeine) and naturalistic stimuli (clam juice, grape juice, lemon juice, and coffee) were matched for taste quality and intensity (concentration). Umami (monosodium glutamate + inosine monophosphate) and fat (diluted heavy cream) were also tested. PbN neurons responded to naturalistic stimuli as much or more than to prototypical taste stimuli. Furthermore, they convey more information about naturalistic stimuli than about prototypical ones. Moreover, multidimensional scaling analyses showed that across unit responses to naturalistic stimuli were more widely separated than responses to prototypical taste stimuli. Interestingly, cream evoked a robust and widespread response in PbN cells. Collectively, these data suggest that natural foods are more potent stimulators of PbN cells than purely gustatory stimuli. Probing PbN cells with pure taste stimuli may underestimate the response repertoire of these cells.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsElectrodes, ImplantedFeeding BehaviorMaleNeuronsPhysical StimulationPonsRats, Sprague-DawleyTasteTaste PerceptionWakefulnessgustatoryneural codingneurophysiologytastetemporal coding

Identifiers

PMID27121585
PMCPMC4961753
OpenAlexW2342854990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.