Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121583›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Frequency-specific insight into short-term memory capacity.

Matteo Feurra, Giulia Galli, Enea Francesco Pavone, Alessandro Rossi, Simone Rossi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Causal functional maps of brain rhythms in working memory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matteo FeurraDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Laboratory (Si-BIN Lab), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy; School of Psychology, Centre for Cognition and Decision Making, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia; mfeurra@hse.ru.
Giulia GalliDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Laboratory (Si-BIN Lab), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Kingston University, Kingston Upon Thames, United Kingdom; and.
Enea Francesco PavoneDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Laboratory (Si-BIN Lab), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy; Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro RossiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Laboratory (Si-BIN Lab), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy;
Simone RossiDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, Unit of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Brain Investigation and Neuromodulation Laboratory (Si-BIN Lab), Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, Siena, Italy;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digit span is one of the most widely used memory tests in clinical and experimental neuropsychology for reliably measuring short-term memory capacity. In the forward version, sequences of digits of increasing length have to be reproduced in the order in which they are presented, whereas in the backward version items must be reproduced in the reversed order. Here, we assessed whether transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) increases the memory span for digits of young and midlife adults. Imperceptibly weak electrical currents in the alpha (10 Hz), beta (20 Hz), theta (5 Hz), and gamma (40 Hz) range, as well as a sham stimulation, were delivered over the left posterior parietal cortex, a cortical region thought to sustain maintenance processes in short-term memory through oscillatory brain activity in the beta range. We showed a frequency-specific effect of beta-tACS that robustly increased the forward memory span of young, but not middle-aged, healthy individuals. The effect correlated with age: the younger the subjects, the greater the benefit arising from parietal beta stimulation. Our results provide evidence of a short-term memory capacity improvement in young adults by online frequency-specific tACS application.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAcoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultAgingAnalysis of VarianceBeta RhythmFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsParietal LobeSpeech PerceptionYoung Adultbeta frequencydigit spanposterior parietal lobeshort-term memorytranscranial alternating current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27121583
PMCPMC4961742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.