Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121576›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Synchronized gamma-frequency inhibition in neocortex depends on excitatory-inhibitory interactions but not electrical synapses.

Garrett T Neske, Barry W Connors

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. On the Diverse Functions of Electrical Synapses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Modification of oxygen consumption and blood flow in mouse somatosensory cortex by cell-type-specific neuronal activity.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Garrett T NeskeDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Barry W ConnorsDepartment of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island BC@brown.edu.
Brown University · US

Funding

Functions of electrical synapses in inhibitory networksR01NS050434 · NINDS · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CONNORS, BARRY W · 2005 to 2017
$3.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS050434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic inhibition plays a crucial role in the precise timing of spiking activity in the cerebral cortex. Synchronized, rhythmic inhibitory activity in the gamma (30-80 Hz) range is thought to be especially important for the active, information-processing neocortex, but the circuit mechanisms that give rise to synchronized inhibition are uncertain. In particular, the relative contributions of reciprocal inhibitory connections, excitatory-inhibitory interactions, and electrical synapses to precise spike synchrony among inhibitory interneurons are not well understood. Here we describe experiments on mouse barrel cortex in vitro as it spontaneously generates slow (<1 Hz) oscillations (Up and Down states). During Up states, inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) are generated at gamma frequencies and are more synchronized than excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) among neighboring pyramidal cells. Furthermore, spikes in homotypic pairs of interneurons are more synchronized than in pairs of pyramidal cells. Comparing connexin36 knockout and wild-type animals, we found that electrical synapses make a minimal contribution to synchronized inhibition during Up states. Estimations of the delays between EPSCs and IPSCs in single pyramidal cells showed that excitation often preceded inhibition by a few milliseconds. Finally, tonic optogenetic activation of different interneuron subtypes in the absence of excitation led to only weak synchrony of IPSCs in pairs of pyramidal neurons. Our results suggest that phasic excitatory inputs are indispensable for synchronized spiking in inhibitory interneurons during Up states and that electrical synapses play a minimal role.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBacterial ProteinsChannelrhodopsinsConnexinsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsGamma RhythmGap Junction delta-2 ProteinInterneuronsLuminescent ProteinsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicModels, NeurologicalNeocortexNeural Inhibition2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acidBacterial ProteinsChannelrhodopsinsConnexinsExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsFG 9041Gap Junction delta-2 ProteinLuminescent ProteinsParvalbuminsQuinoxalinesSomatostatinValineyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteriacortexelectrical synapsegammainhibitionoscillation

Identifiers

PMID27121576
PMCPMC4969394
OpenAlexW2342955273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.