Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121262›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Pharmacokinetics of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in solid tumour patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.

Neeraj Gupta, Michael J Hanley, Karthik Venkatakrishnan, Raymond Perez, Robin E Norris, John Nemunaitis, Huyuan Yang, Mark G Qian, Gerald Falchook, Richard Labotka and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Next-generation proteasome inhibitors for cancer therapy.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Neeraj GuptaMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Michael J HanleyMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Karthik VenkatakrishnanMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Raymond PerezUniversity of Kansas Clinical Research Center, Fairway, KS, USA.
Robin E NorrisUniversity Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA.
John NemunaitisMary Crowley Cancer Research Centers, Dallas, TX, USA.
Huyuan YangMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Mark G QianMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Gerald FalchookSarah Cannon Research Institute at HealthONE, Denver, CO, USA.
Richard LabotkaMillennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.
Siqing FuThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the present study was to characterize the pharmacokinetics of the oral proteasome inhibitor, ixazomib, in patients with solid tumours and moderate or severe hepatic impairment, to provide posology recommendations.

methodsEligible adults with advanced malignancies for which no further effective therapy was available received a single dose of ixazomib on day 1 of the pharmacokinetic cycle; patients with normal hepatic function, moderate hepatic impairment or severe hepatic impairment received 4 mg, 2.3 mg or 1.5 mg, respectively. Blood samples for single-dose pharmacokinetic characterization were collected over 336 h postdose. After sampling, patients could continue to receive ixazomib on days 1, 8 and 15 in 28-day cycles.

resultsOf 48 enrolled patients (13, 15 and 20 in the normal, moderate and severe groups, respectively), 43 were pharmacokinetics-evaluable. Ixazomib was rapidly absorbed (median time to reach peak concentration was 0.95-1.5 h) and highly bound to plasma proteins, with a similar mean fraction bound (~99%) across the three groups. In patients with moderate/severe hepatic impairment (combined group), the geometric least squares mean ratios (90% confidence interval) for unbound and total dose-normalized area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration in reference to the normal hepatic function group were 1.27 (0.75, 2.16) and 1.20 (0.79, 1.82), respectively. Seven (15%) of the 48 patients experienced a grade 3 drug-related adverse event; there were no drug-related grade 4 adverse events.

conclusionsIn patients with moderate/severe hepatic impairment, unbound and total systemic exposures of ixazomib were 27% and 20% higher, respectively, vs. normal hepatic function. A reduced ixazomib starting dose of 3 mg is recommended for patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBoron CompoundsFemaleGlycineHumansLiver DiseasesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProteasome InhibitorsYoung AdultBoron CompoundsGlycineixazomibProteasome Inhibitorshepatic impairmentixazomibphase 1 clinical trialproteasome inhibitorsolid tumours

Identifiers

PMID27121262
PMCPMC5089614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.