Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27121191›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Cancer stem cells are underestimated by standard experimental methods in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Craig Gedye, Danylo Sirskyj, Nazleen C Lobo, Jalna Meens, Elzbieta Hyatt, Michael Robinette, Neil Fleshner, Robert J Hamilton, Girish Kulkarni, Alexandre Zlotta and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Agent-Based Learning Model for the Obesity Paradox in RCC.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Craig GedyeSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
Danylo SirskyjPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Nazleen C LoboPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Jalna MeensPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Elzbieta HyattHospital for Sick Children, Program in Genetics and Genome Biology, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada.
Michael RobinettePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Neil FleshnerPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Robert J HamiltonPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Girish KulkarniPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Alexandre ZlottaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Andrew EvansPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Antonio FinelliPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Michael A S JewettPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
Laurie E AillesPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, M5G 1L7, Canada.
University Health Network · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rare cancer stem cells (CSC) are proposed to be responsible for tumour propagation and re-initiation and are functionally defined by identifying tumour-initiating cells (TICs) using the xenotransplantation limiting dilution assay (LDA). While TICs in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) appeared rare in NOD/SCID/IL2Rγ(-/-) (NSG) mice, xenografts formed more efficiently from small tumour fragments, indicating the LDA underestimated ccRCC TIC frequency. Mechanistic interrogation of the LDA identified multiple steps that influence ccRCC TIC quantitation. For example, tissue disaggregation destroys most ccRCC cells, common assays significantly overestimate tumour cell viability, and microenvironmental supplementation with human extracellular factors or pharmacological inhibition of anoikis increase clonogenicity and tumourigenicity of ccRCC cell lines and primary tumour cells. Identification of these previously uncharacterized concerns that cumulatively lead to substantial underestimation of TICs in ccRCC provides a framework for development of more accurate TIC assays in the future, both for this disease and for other cancers.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarcinoma, Renal CellCell CountDisease Models, AnimalHeterograftsMiceMice, SCIDNeoplastic Stem CellsPathology

Identifiers

PMID27121191
PMCPMC4848484
OpenAlexW2342570238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.