Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27120468›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2016

Racial differences in receipt of adjuvant hormonal therapy among Medicaid enrollees in South Carolina diagnosed with breast cancer.

Tisha M Felder, D Phuong Do, Z Kevin Lu, Lincy S Lal, Sue P Heiney, Charles L Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tisha M FelderCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Room 620, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. feldert@mailbox.sc.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5693-7749
D Phuong DoPublic Health Policy and Administration, Zilber School of Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 1240 N. 10th Street, Milwaukee, WI, 53201, USA.
Z Kevin LuClinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Lincy S LalManagement, Policy & Community Health, University of Texas School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, 1200 Herman Pressler Drive, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Sue P HeineyCollege of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene Street, Room 617, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Charles L BennettClinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Funding

Improving Adherence to Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy among Disadvantaged Breast Cancer SurvivorsK01CA193667 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FELDER, TISHA · 2015 to 2019
$631k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA193667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several factors contribute to the pervasive Black-White disparity in breast cancer mortality in the U.S., such as tumor biology, access to care, and treatments received including adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT), which significantly improves survival for hormone receptor-positive breast cancers (HR+). We analyzed South Carolina Central Cancer Registry-Medicaid linked data to determine if, in an equal access health care system, racial differences in the receipt of AHT exist. We evaluated 494 study-eligible, Black (n = 255) and White women (n = 269) who were under 65 years old and diagnosed with stages I-III, HR+ breast cancers between 2004 and 2007. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess receipt of ≥1 AHT prescriptions at any point in time following (ever-use) or within 12 months of (early-use) breast cancer diagnosis. Seventy-two percent of the participants were ever-users (70 % Black, 74 % White) and 68 % were early-users (65 % Black, 71 % White) of AHT. Neither ever-use (adjusted OR (AOR) = 0.75, 95 % CI 0.48-1.17) nor early-use (AOR = 0.70, 95 % CI 0.46-1.06) of AHT differed by race. However, receipt of other breast cancer-specific treatments was independently associated with ever-use and early-use of AHT [ever-use: receipt of surgery (AOR = 2.15, 95 % CI 1.35-3.44); chemotherapy (AOR = 1.97, 95 % CI 1.22-3.20); radiation (AOR = 2.33, 95 % CI 1.50-3.63); early-use: receipt of surgery (AOR = 2.03, 95 % CI 1.30-3.17); chemotherapy (AOR = 1.90, 95 % CI 1.20-3.03); radiation (AOR = 1.73, 95 % CI 1.14-2.63)]. No racial variations in use of AHT among women with HR+ breast cancers insured by Medicaid in South Carolina were identified, but overall rates of AHT use by these women is low. Strategies to improve overall use of AHT should include targeting breast cancer patients who do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansMedicaidMiddle AgedSouth CarolinaSurvival AnalysisTime-to-TreatmentTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesWhite PeopleAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast neoplasmsMedicaid, healthcare disparities, antineoplastic agents, hormonalPractice guidelines

Identifiers

PMID27120468
PMCPMC4979582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.