Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27120075›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2016

Potential role for microfluctuations as a temporal directional cue to accommodation.

Sangeetha Metlapally, Jianliang L Tong, Humza J Tahir, Clifton M Schor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The random walk of accommodation fluctuations.Biomedical optics express · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sangeetha Metlapally
Jianliang L Tong
Humza J Tahir
Clifton M Schor

Funding

UC Berkeley Vision Science COREP30EY003176 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Marla Feller · 1985 to 2026
$16.4M
Berkeley Clinical Scientist Development ProgramK12EY017269 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI POLSE, KENNETH A · 2005 to 2014
$8.6M
Role of optical aberrations in 3D space perception: Implications for KeratoconusK23EY024691 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI METLAPALLY, SANGEETHA · 2014 to 2018
$779k
INTERACTION BETWEEN RETINA &PIGMENT EPITHELIUMR01EY001678 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MARMOR, MICHAEL · 1985 to 1993
–
NEI NIH HHS EY003176NEI NIH HHS K12 EY017269NEI NIH HHS K23 EY024691NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003176NEI NIH HHS R01 EY01678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal was to revisit an important, yet unproven notion that accommodative microfluctuations facilitate the determination of direction (sign) of abrupt focus changes in the stimulus to accommodation. We contaminated the potential temporal cues from natural accommodative microfluctuations by presenting uncorrelated external (screen) temporal defocus noise that combined with the retinal image effects of natural microfluctuations. A polychromatic Maltese spoke pattern thus either modulated defocus at a combination of two temporal frequencies (on-screen noise condition) or was static (control condition). The on-screen conditions were combined with step changes in optical vergence that were randomized in direction and magnitude. Five subjects monocularly viewed stimuli through a Badal optical system in a Maxwellian view. An artificial 4-mm aperture was imaged at the entrance pupil of the eye. Wavefront aberrations were measured dynamically at 50 Hz using a custom Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. Dynamic changes in the Zernike defocus term with step changes in optical vergence were analyzed. We calculated the percentage of correct directional responses for 1, 2, and 3 D accommodative and disaccommodative step stimuli using preset criteria for latency, velocity, and persistence of the response. The on-screen noise condition reduced the percent-correct responses compared to the static stimulus, suggesting that this manipulation affected the detectability of the sign of the accommodative stimulus. Several possible reasons and implications of this result are discussed.

Indexed as

CuesAberrometryAccommodation, OcularAdolescentAdultCorneal Wavefront AberrationFemaleHumansMalePupilYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27120075
PMCPMC4900136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.