Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27119849›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

An Improved microRNA Annotation of the Canine Genome.

Luca Penso-Dolfin, Ross Swofford, Jeremy Johnson, Jessica Alföldi, Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, David Swarbreck, Simon Moxon, Federica Di Palma

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Luca Penso-DolfinVertebrate and Health Genomics, The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4893-2400
Ross SwoffordVertebrate Genome Biology, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jeremy JohnsonVertebrate Genome Biology, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jessica AlföldiVertebrate Genome Biology, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Kerstin Lindblad-TohVertebrate Genome Biology, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
David SwarbreckRegulatory Genomics, The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Simon MoxonRegulatory Genomics, The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Federica Di PalmaVertebrate and Health Genomics, The Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Broad Institute · USEarlham Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestic dog, Canis familiaris, is a valuable model for studying human diseases. The publication of the latest Canine genome build and annotation, CanFam3.1 provides an opportunity to enhance our understanding of gene regulation across tissues in the dog model system. In this study, we used the latest dog genome assembly and small RNA sequencing data from 9 different dog tissues to predict novel miRNAs in the dog genome, as well as to annotate conserved miRNAs from the miRBase database that were missing from the current dog annotation. We used both miRCat and miRDeep2 algorithms to computationally predict miRNA loci. The resulting, putative hairpin sequences were analysed in order to discard false positives, based on predicted secondary structures and patterns of small RNA read alignments. Results were further divided into high and low confidence miRNAs, using the same criteria. We generated tissue specific expression profiles for the resulting set of 811 loci: 720 conserved miRNAs, (207 of which had not been previously annotated in the dog genome) and 91 novel miRNA loci. Comparative analyses revealed 8 putative homologues of some novel miRNA in ferret, and one in microbat. All miRNAs were also classified into the genic and intergenic categories, based on the Ensembl RefSeq gene annotation for CanFam3.1. This additionally allowed us to identify four previously undescribed MiRtrons among our total set of miRNAs. We additionally annotated piRNAs, using proTRAC on the same input data. We thus identified 263 putative clusters, most of which (211 clusters) were found to be expressed in testis. Our results represent an important improvement of the dog genome annotation, paving the way to further research on the evolution of gene regulation, as well as on the contribution of post-transcriptional regulation to pathological conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsDogsGene Expression RegulationGenetic LociGenomeMicroRNAsMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA, Small InterferingMicroRNAsRNA, Small Interfering

Identifiers

PMID27119849
PMCPMC4847789
OpenAlexW2344707076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.