Trial reportProteomics. Clinical applications2016
Development of a MALDI MS-based platform for early detection of acute kidney injury.
Trial report in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictive models of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury based on machine learning: a scoping review.Renal failure · 2024Article
- Recent Advances of Proteomics in Management of Acute Kidney Injury.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The application of omic technologies to research in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Review
- New Approaches to Identify Sepsis Biomarkers: The Importance of Model and Sample Source for Mass Spectrometry.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2020Review
- Urinary Peptidomic Biomarkers in Kidney Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Novel Urinary Biomarkers For Improved Prediction Of Progressive Egfr Loss In Early Chronic Kidney Disease Stages And In High Risk Individuals Without Chronic Kidney Disease.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Novel acute kidney injury biomarkers: their characteristics, utility and concerns.International urology and nephrology · 2018Review
- Urinary neprilysin in the critically ill patient.BMC nephrology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSeptic acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with poor outcome. This can partly be attributed to delayed diagnosis and incomplete understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. Our aim was to develop an early predictive test for AKI based on the analysis of urinary peptide biomarkers by MALDI-MS. EXPERIMENTAL
designUrine samples from 95 patients with sepsis were analyzed by MALDI-MS. Marker search and multimarker model establishment were performed using the peptide profiles from 17 patients with existing or within the next 5 days developing AKI and 17 with no change in renal function. Replicates of urine sample pools from the AKI and non-AKI patient groups and normal controls were also included to select the analytically most robust AKI markers.
resultsThirty-nine urinary peptides were selected by cross-validated variable selection to generate a support vector machine multidimensional AKI classifier. Prognostic performance of the AKI classifier on an independent validation set including the remaining 61 patients of the study population (17 controls and 44 cases) was good with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.82 and a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A urinary peptide marker model detects onset of AKI with acceptable accuracy in septic patients. Such a platform can eventually be transferred to the clinic as fast MALDI-MS test format.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.