ReviewBiophysical journal2016
Optics-Integrated Microfluidic Platforms for Biomolecular Analyses.
Review in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidics-Based Nanobiosensors for Healthcare Monitoring.Molecular biotechnology · 2024Review
- Unpacking the packaged optical fiber bio-sensors: understanding the obstacle for biomedical application.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Roadmap on optical sensors.Journal of optics (2010) · 2024Review
- Label-Free Physical Techniques and Methodologies for Proteins Detection in Microfluidic Biosensor Structures.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Micromirror-Embedded Coverslip Assembly for Bidirectional Microscopic Imaging.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Vertically sheathing laminar flow-based immunoassay using simultaneous diffusion-driven immune reactions.RSC advances · 2019Article
- Optofluidics Refractometers.Micromachines · 2018Review
- Analytic model for the complex effective index of the leaky modes of tube-type anti-resonant hollow core fibers.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Radiative decay engineering 8: Coupled emission microscopy for lens-free high-throughput fluorescence detection.Analytical biochemistry · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Compared with conventional optical methods, optics implemented on microfluidic chips provide small, and often much cheaper ways to interrogate biological systems from the level of single molecules up to small model organisms. The optical probing of single molecules has been used to investigate the mechanical properties of individual biological molecules; however, multiplexing of these measurements through microfluidics and nanofluidics confers many analytical advantages. Optics-integrated microfluidic systems can significantly simplify sample processing and allow a more user-friendly experience; alignments of on-chip optical components are predetermined during fabrication and many purely optical techniques are passively controlled. Furthermore, sample loss from complicated preparation and fluid transfer steps can be virtually eliminated, a particularly important attribute for biological molecules at very low concentrations. Excellent fluid handling and high surface area/volume ratios also contribute to faster detection times for low abundance molecules in small sample volumes. Although integration of optical systems with classical microfluidic analysis techniques has been limited, microfluidics offers a ready platform for interrogation of biophysical properties. By exploiting the ease with which fluids and particles can be precisely and dynamically controlled in microfluidic devices, optical sensors capable of unique imaging modes, single molecule manipulation, and detection of minute changes in concentration of an analyte are possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.