Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27119336›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Neandertal versus Modern Human Dietary Responses to Climatic Fluctuations.

Sireen El Zaatari, Frederick E Grine, Peter S Ungar, Jean-Jacques Hublin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diet's impact on gut microbial assemblage in health and disease.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  3. Reconciling Species Concepts: An Ecological Perspective.American journal of biological anthropology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Changing perspectives on early hominin diets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The 4 D's of Pellagra and Progress.International journal of tryptophan research : IJTR · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact of climate change on the transition of Neanderthals to modern humans in Europe.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  15. EarlyInterface focus · 2017
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Are We Reaching the Limits ofFrontiers in physiology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sireen El ZaatariPaleoanthropology, Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Paleoenvironment, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Frederick E GrineDepartment of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Peter S UngarDepartment of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States of America.
Jean-Jacques HublinDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Neandertal lineage developed successfully throughout western Eurasia and effectively survived the harsh and severely changing environments of the alternating glacial/interglacial cycles from the middle of the Pleistocene until Marine Isotope Stage 3. Yet, towards the end of this stage, at the time of deteriorating climatic conditions that eventually led to the Last Glacial Maximum, and soon after modern humans entered western Eurasia, the Neandertals disappeared. Western Eurasia was by then exclusively occupied by modern humans. We use occlusal molar microwear texture analysis to examine aspects of diet in western Eurasian Paleolithic hominins in relation to fluctuations in food supplies that resulted from the oscillating climatic conditions of the Pleistocene. There is demonstrable evidence for differences in behavior that distinguish Upper Paleolithic humans from members of the Neandertal lineage. Specifically, whereas the Neandertals altered their diets in response to changing paleoecological conditions, the diets of Upper Paleolithic humans seem to have been less affected by slight changes in vegetation/climatic conditions but were linked to changes in their technological complexes. The results of this study also indicate differences in resource exploitation strategies between these two hominin groups. We argue that these differences in subsistence strategies, if they had already been established at the time of the first contact between these two hominin taxa, may have given modern humans an advantage over the Neandertals, and may have contributed to the persistence of our species despite habitat-related changes in food availabilities associated with climate fluctuations.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnthropology, PhysicalClimateDietEcosystemFeeding BehaviorFossilsHominidaeHumansMolarNeanderthalsPaleodontology

Identifiers

PMID27119336
PMCPMC4847867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.