Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27119313›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2016

Chromosomal microarray analysis in clinical evaluation of neurodevelopmental disorders-reporting a novel deletion of SETDB1 and illustration of counseling challenge.

Qiong Xu, Jennifer Goldstein, Ping Wang, Inder K Gadi, Heather Labreche, Catherine Rehder, Wei-Ping Wang, Allyn McConkie, Xiu Xu, Yong-Hui Jiang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mllt11 Regulates Migration and Neurite Outgrowth of Cortical Projection Neurons during Development.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. The Epigenome in Neurodevelopmental Disorders.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Qiong XuDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer GoldsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Ping WangDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Inder K GadiLabCorp., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Heather LabrecheDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Catherine RehderDepartment of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Wei-Ping WangChildren's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Allyn McConkieDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Xiu XuChildren's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yong-Hui JiangDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University · USChildren's Hospital of Fudan University · CNInstitut thématique Génétique, génomique et bioinformatique · FRLabCorp (United States) · US

Funding

Analysis of Shank3 Complete and Temporal and Spatial Specific Knockout MiceR01MH098114 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, YONG-HUI · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
A novel neural circuit analysis paradigm to model autism in miceR21MH104316 · NIMH · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, YONG-HUI · 2014 to 2015
$435k
Therapeutic potential for Prader-Willi syndromeR21HD077197 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, YONG-HUI · 2014 to 2015
$413k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD077197NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098114NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH104316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pathogenicity of copy number variations (CNV) in neurodevelopmental disorders is supported by research literature. However, few studies have evaluated the utility and counseling challenges of CNV analysis in clinic.

methodsWe analyzed the findings of CNV studies from a cohort referred for genetics evaluation of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), developmental disability (DD), and intellectual disability (ID).

resultsTwenty-two CNV in 21 out of 115 probands are considered to be pathogenic (18.3%). Five CNV are likely pathogenic and 22 CNV are variants of unknown significance (VUS). We have found seven cases with more than two CNV and two with a complex rearrangement of the 22q13.3 Phelan-McDermid syndrome region. We identified a new and de novo 1q21.3 deletion that encompasses SETDB1, a gene encoding methylates histone H3 on lysine-9 (H3K9) methyltransferase, in a case with ASD.

conclusionWe provide evidence to support the value of CNV analysis in etiological evaluation of neurodevelopmental disorders in autism genetics clinic. However, interpretation of the clinical significance and counseling families are still challenging because of the variable penetrance and pleotropic expressivity of CNV. In addition, the identification of a 1q21.3 deletion encompassing SETDB1 provides further support for the role of chromatin modifiers in the etiology of ASD.

Indexed as

Microarray AnalysisAdolescentAlgorithmsAutistic DisorderChildChild, PreschoolChromatinComparative Genomic HybridizationCounselingDevelopmental DisabilitiesDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGene DeletionGene RearrangementHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansChromatinHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseProtein MethyltransferasesSETDB1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27119313
PMCPMC5382808
OpenAlexW2342774921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.