ArticleSpringerPlus2016
Incidence and prevalence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in SpringerPlus, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- The role of cortisol as a physiological stress indicator in fish contamination byItalian journal of food safety · 2026Article
- Rapid on-site detection of viable Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood using cis-diamminedichloroplatinum and colorimetric loop-mediated isothermal amplification (CDDP-LAMP).International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2025Article
- Distribution, Antibiotic Resistance, and Virulence Factors ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The role of sea fish meat in the transmission ofVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Evaluation of MALDI-TOF for identification of Vibrio cholerae and Vibrio parahaemolyticus from growth on agar media.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
- Toll-like Receptor Expression inGenes · 2024Article
- Public health aspects ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Isolation and characterization of an antimicrobial Bacillus subtilis strain O-741 against Vibrio parahaemolyticus.PloS one · 2024Article
- Spotlight on the epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles ofFuture microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- Predicting the Growth ofMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Seafood-Borne Pathogens in Retail Seafood Sold in Malaysia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Multiorgan Dysfunction With Severe Cardiac Injury Secondary to Septic Cellulitis Due to Vibrio parahaemolyticus.Cureus · 2022Article
- Life history of oysters influences Vibrio parahaemolyticus accumulation in Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas).Environmental microbiology · 2022Article
- Development of a Controlled Laboratory-scale Inoculation System to Study Vibrio parahaemolyticus-oyster Interactions.FEMS microbiology letters · 2022Article
- Recovery of Pasteurization-ResistantFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vibrio parahaemolyticus is an important seafood borne human pathogen worldwide due to it occurrence, prevalence and ability to cause gastrointestinal infections. This current study aim at investigating the incidence and prevalence of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood using systematic review-meta-analysis by exploring heterogeneity among primary studies. A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of peer reviewed primary studies reported between 2003 and 2015 for the occurrence and prevalence of V. parahaemolyticus in seafood was conducted using "isolation", "detection", "prevalence", "incidence", "occurrence" or "enumeration" and V. parahaemolyticus as search algorithms in Web of Science (Science Direct) and ProQuest of electronic bibliographic databases. Data extracted from the primary studies were then analyzed with fixed effect meta-analysis model for effect rate to explore heterogeneity between the primary studies. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plot. A total of 10,819 articles were retrieved from the data bases of which 48 studies met inclusion criteria. V. parahaemolyticus could only be isolated from 2761 (47.5 %) samples of 5811 seafood investigated. The result of this study shows that incidence of V. parahaemolyticus was more prevalent in oysters with overall prevalence rate of 63.4 % (95 % CI 0.592-0.674) than other seafood. Overall prevalence rate of clams was 52.9 % (95 % CI 0.490-0.568); fish 51.0 % (95 % CI 0.476-0.544); shrimps 48.3 % (95 % CI 0.454-0.512) and mussels, scallop and periwinkle: 28.0 % (95 % CI 0.255-0.307). High heterogeneity (p value <0.001; I (2) = 95.291) was observed mussel compared to oysters (I (2) = 91.024). It could be observed from this study that oysters harbor V. parahaemolyticus based on the prevalence rate than other seafood investigated. The occurrence and prevalence of V. parahaemolyticus is of public health importance, hence, more studies involving seafood such as mussels need to be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.