Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27119020›Full record

ArticlePain research and treatment2016

Chronic Neck Pain and Cervico-Craniofacial Pain Patients Express Similar Levels of Neck Pain-Related Disability, Pain Catastrophizing, and Cervical Range of Motion.

Daniel Muñoz-García, Alfonso Gil-Martínez, Almudena López-López, Ibai Lopez-de-Uralde-Villanueva, Roy La Touche, Josué Fernández-Carnero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain research and treatment, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03547752 (Inmediate Effect of the Visualization of Action), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03547752 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Inmediate Effect of the Visualization of Action

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad Autonoma de MadridRan2017 to 2018Enrolled42ConditionsNeck Pain, Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal PainArmsobserved action and motor imaginery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Massage for neck pain.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Quality of life, craniomandibular function, and psychosocial factors related to pain and movement in patients with head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Muñoz-GarcíaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Research Group on Movement and Behavioural Science and Study of Pain, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain.
Alfonso Gil-MartínezDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Research Group on Movement and Behavioural Science and Study of Pain, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), 28023 Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Almudena López-LópezDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos Alcorcón, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
Ibai Lopez-de-Uralde-VillanuevaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Research Group on Movement and Behavioural Science and Study of Pain, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), 28023 Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Roy La ToucheDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Science, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Research Group on Movement and Behavioural Science and Study of Pain, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), 28023 Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Josué Fernández-CarneroResearch Group on Movement and Behavioural Science and Study of Pain, Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28023 Madrid, Spain; Institute of Neuroscience and Craniofacial Pain (INDCRAN), 28023 Madrid, Spain; Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain; Department of Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28922 Madrid, Spain.
Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESINDCRAN · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background. Neck pain (NP) is strongly associated with cervico-craniofacial pain (CCFP). The primary aim of the present study was to compare the neck pain-related disability, pain catastrophizing, and cervical and mandibular ROM between patients with chronic mechanical NP and patients with CCFP, as well as asymptomatic subjects. Methods. A total of 64 participants formed three groups. All participants underwent a clinical examination evaluating the cervical range of motion and maximum mouth opening, neck disability index (NDI), and psychological factor of Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). Results. There were no statistically significant differences between patients with NP and CCFP for NDI and PCS (P > 0.05). One- way ANOVA revealed significant differences for all ROM measurements. The post hoc analysis showed no statistically significant differences in cervical extension and rotation between the two patient groups (P > 0.05). The Pearson correlation analysis shows a moderate positive association between NDI and the PCS for the group of patients with NP and CCFP. Conclusion. The CCFP and NP patient groups have similar neck disability levels and limitation in cervical ROM in extension and rotation. Both groups had positively correlated the NDI with the PCS.

Identifiers

PMID27119020
PMCPMC4828545
OpenAlexW2324468298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.