Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27118854›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

The Development and Piloting of Parallel Scales Measuring External and Internal HIV and Tuberculosis Stigma Among Healthcare Workers in the Free State Province, South Africa.

Edwin Wouters, Asta Rau, Michelle Engelbrecht, Kerry Uebel, Jacob Siegel, Caroline Masquillier, Gladys Kigozi, Nina Sommerland, Annalee Yassi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Stigma and Discrimination (SAD) at the Time of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Tuberculosis and Healthcare Workers in Underresourced Settings.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Edwin WoutersDepartment of Sociology and Research Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium Centre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Asta RauCentre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Michelle EngelbrechtCentre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Kerry UebelCentre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Jacob SiegelSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Caroline MasquillierDepartment of Sociology and Research Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Gladys KigoziCentre for Health Systems Research and Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Nina SommerlandDepartment of Sociology and Research Centre for Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Annalee YassiSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

CIHR 115212-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dual burden of tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is severely impacting the South African healthcare workforce. However, the use of on-site occupational health services is hampered by stigma among the healthcare workforce. The success of stigma-reduction interventions is difficult to evaluate because of a dearth of appropriate scientific tools to measure stigma in this specific professional setting.

methodsThe current pilot study aimed to develop and test a range of scales measuring different aspects of stigma-internal and external stigma toward tuberculosis as well as HIV-in a South African healthcare setting. The study employed data of a sample of 200 staff members of a large hospital in Bloemfontein, South Africa.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis produced 7 scales, displaying internal construct validity: (1) colleagues' external HIV stigma, (2) colleagues' actions against external HIV stigma, (3) respondent's external HIV stigma, (4) respondent's internal HIV stigma, (5) colleagues' external tuberculosis stigma, (6) respondent's external tuberculosis stigma, and (7) respondent's internal tuberculosis stigma. Subsequent analyses (reliability analysis, structural equation modeling) demonstrated that the scales displayed good psychometric properties in terms of reliability and external construct validity.

conclusionsThe study outcomes support the use of the developed scales as a valid and reliable means to measure levels of tuberculosis- and HIV-related stigma among the healthcare workforce in a resource-limited context. Future studies should build on these findings to fine-tune the instruments and apply them to larger study populations across a range of different resource-limited healthcare settings with high HIV and tuberculosis prevalence.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelHIV InfectionsSocial StigmaTuberculosisAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsResearch DesignSouth AfricaSurveys and QuestionnairesHIVmeasurement toolsstigmatuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID27118854
PMCPMC5262473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.