Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27118700›Full record

ArticleAge and ageing2016

Increasing delirium skills at the front door: results from a repeated survey on delirium knowledge and attitudes.

Rodric Peter Llewelyn Jenkin, Adam Al-Attar, Sarah Richardson, Phyo Kyaw Myint, Alasdair M J MacLullich, Daniel H J Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Age and ageing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rodric Peter Llewelyn JenkinDepartment for the Care of Older People, Whittington Hospital, London, UK.
Adam Al-AttarDepartment of Medicine for the Elderly, St Mary's Hospital, London W2 1NY, UK.
Sarah RichardsonInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Phyo Kyaw MyintSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland AB25 2ZD, UK.
Alasdair M J MacLullichGeriatric Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.
Daniel H J DavisMRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.
MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing · GBNewcastle University · GBSt Mary's Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Aberdeen · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12019/1Medical Research Council MR/K026992/1Wellcome Trust WT090661/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgrounddelirium is under-recognised in comparison to other common and serious acute disorders. A 2006 survey of UK junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) identified poor knowledge of the diagnostic criteria and treatment of delirium. We hypothesised that increased prominence accorded to delirium in the form of national initiatives and guidelines may have had an impact on understanding among junior doctors.

objectivewe repeated a multi-centre survey of knowledge of and attitudes to delirium in junior doctors (not undertaking specialist training) assessing unselected acute medical presentations (the 'medical take').

designquestionnaire-based survey in 48 acute hospitals in UK and Ireland.

methodswe used questionnaires designed to test understanding of delirium, including prevalence, knowledge of the DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, use of specific screening tools, association with adverse outcomes and pharmacological management.

resultsone thousand two hundred and fifteen trainee physicians participated. Compared with the 2006 cohort, improvements were seen in 9 of 17 knowledge-based questions and overall score improved in the 2013 cohort. Nonetheless, significant deficits in knowledge, particularly for the diagnostic criteria for delirium, remained.

conclusionsdespite improvements in some aspects of delirium knowledge, the diagnostic criteria for delirium remain poorly understood. Challenges remain in ensuring adequate training for junior doctors in delirium.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMental Status and Dementia TestsCognitionCognitive AgingDeliriumHealth Care SurveysHumansIrelandMedical Staff, HospitalPredictive Value of TestsPrevalenceUnited Kingdomdeliriumeducationolder peoplequestionnairesurvey

Identifiers

PMID27118700
PMCPMC4916344
OpenAlexW2344680367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.