ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2016
Visuospatial working memory influences the interaction between space and time.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neural networks underlying magnitude perception: a specific meta-analysis of fMRI studies.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Pooled it
- Space-time interference between the length and duration of static lines.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Presentation time shapes perceived room size in visual and auditory modalities.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- Memory capacity as the core mechanism of the development of space-time interferences in children.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Time and visual-spatial illusions: Evidence for cross-dimensional interference between duration and illusory size.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Integration or separation? Spatial and temporal representations of whole-body movements in visual working memory.Memory & cognition · 2023Article
- Attention modulates incidental memory encoding of human movements.Cognitive processing · 2022Article
- Cross-dimensional magnitude interaction is modulated by representational noise: evidence from space-time interaction.Psychological research · 2022Article
- Can Implicit or Explicit Time Processing Impact Numerical Representation? Evidence From a Dual Task Paradigm.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- Spontaneous, modality-general abstraction of a ratio scale.Cognition · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
How do representations of space inform our perception of time? In language, spatial vocabulary is frequently used to describe temporal concepts, and spatial information biases temporal perception even in non-verbal tasks. In contrast, temporal information typically exerts little, if any, influence on the perception of spatial extent. Here, we used spatial and temporal reproduction tasks, both with and without verbal and spatial dual tasks, to investigate the mechanism underlying the asymmetric relation between space and time. Specifically, we tested whether the asymmetric interference between spatial and temporal stimulus attributes arises from interference in verbal or visuospatial working memory. We found that loading visuospatial working memory, but not verbal working memory, eliminated the asymmetric pattern of interference. This suggests that the interference between spatial and temporal representations arises due to processing constraints in visuospatial working memory. These findings are discussed in terms of the load theory of attention and the relative automaticity with which spatial and temporal information is processed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27118460What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.