ArticleBMJ open2016
Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and health outcomes: protocol for a systematic review.
Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Study protocol of an equivalence randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of three different approaches to collecting Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) data using the Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry-Victoria (PCOR-VIC).BMC health services research · 2017Trial
- A Digital Registry and Education Network for Child Maltreatment Protection: Protocol for a Pilot Observational Exploratory Intervention Study.JMIR research protocols · 2026Observational
- Optimizing Hearing Rehabilitation in Chronic Otitis Media: An Expert Opinion on Early Integration of Bone Conduction Devices.Journal of audiology & otology · 2026Review
- Establishing an Australian pediatric spinal cord disorder register using consumer, health professional, and researcher perspectives.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2024Article
- Neonatal Resuscitation Online Registry in Shenzhen: protocol for a prospective, multicentre, open, observational cohort study.BMJ open · 2024Observational
- Iranian Hydatid Disease Registry: Establishment and Implementation of a Neglected Tropical Disease Registry.Archives of Iranian medicine · 2023Article
- Developing an Australian Melanoma Clinical Outcomes Registry (MelCOR): a protocol paper.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Childhood glaucoma registry in Germany: initial database, clinical care and research (pilot study).BMC research notes · 2022Article
- Planning and management to control and eliminate HTLV-1 infection in Iran.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2021Article
- Medium cut-off dialyzers in a large population of hemodialysis patients in Colombia: COREXH registry.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2021Observational
- Article
- Facilitators of research registry enrollment and potential variation by race and gender.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2018Article
- The CANadian Pediatric Weight management Registry (CANPWR): lessons learned from developing and initiating a national, multi-centre study embedded in pediatric clinical practice.BMC pediatrics · 2018Observational
- Global coverage of health information systems for kidney disease: availability, challenges, and opportunities for development.Kidney international supplements · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMany developed countries have regional and national clinical registries aimed at improving health outcomes of patients diagnosed with particular diseases or cared for in particular healthcare settings. Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are clinical registries established with the purpose of monitoring quality of care and providing feedback to improve health outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to understand the impact of CQRs on (1) mortality/survival; (2) measures of outcome that reflect a process or outcome of healthcare; (3) healthcare utilisation and (4) costs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The PRISMA-P methodology, checklist and standard strategy using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and structured data abstraction tools will be followed. A search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CINAHL will be undertaken, in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature, to identify studies in English covering the period January 1980 to December 2014. Case-control, cohort, randomised controlled trials and controlled clinical trials which describe the registry as an intervention will be eligible for inclusion. Narrative synthesis of study findings will be conducted, guided by a conceptual framework developed to analyse the outcome measure of the registry using defined criteria. If sufficient studies are identified with a similar outcome of interest and measure using the same comparator and time of interval, results will be pooled for random-effects meta-analysis. Test for heterogeneity and sensitivity analysis will be conducted. To identify reporting bias, forest plots and funnel plots will be created and, if required, Egger's test will be conducted. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as primary data will not be collected. Review results will be published as a part of thesis, peer-reviewed journal and conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015017319.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.