Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27118184›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Better than nothing? maternal, newborn, and child health services and perinatal mortality, Lubumbashi, democratic republic of the Congo: a cohort study.

Abel Mukengeshayi Ntambue, Françoise Kaj Malonga, Michele Dramaix-Wilmet, Roger Nlandu Ngatu, Philippe Donnen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Perinatal Mortality Analysis in Espírito Santo, Brazil, 2008 to 2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Unattended Pregnancies and Perinatal Mortality in Georgia.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abel Mukengeshayi NtambueUniversité de Lubumbashi: École de Santé Publique, Unité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la Mère, du Nouveau-né et de l'enfant, Lubumbashi (DRC), Democratic Republic of the Congo. abelntambue@yahoo.fr.
Françoise Kaj MalongaUniversité de Lubumbashi: École de Santé Publique, Unité d'Epidémiologie et de Santé de la Mère, du Nouveau-né et de l'enfant, Lubumbashi (DRC), Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Michele Dramaix-WilmetUniversité Libre de Bruxelles: École de Santé Publique: Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche clinique, Brussels, Belgium.
Roger Nlandu NgatuGraduate School of Health and Nursing Sciences & Disaster Nursing Global Leader doctoral program (DNGL), University of Kochi, Kochi, Japan.
Philippe DonnenUniversité Libre de Bruxelles: École de Santé Publique: Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie, Biostatistiques et recherche clinique, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has a high rate of perinatal mortality (PMR), and health measures that could reduce this high rate of mortality are not accessible to all women. Where they are in place, their quality is not optimal. This study was initiated to assess the relationship between these suboptimal maternal, newborn and child health (MNCH) services and perinatal mortality (PM) in Lubumbashi, DRC's second-largest city.

methodsWe conducted a prospective cohort study, comparing women who had no, low, moderate, or high numbers of antenatal care (ANC) visits; three different levels of delivery care; and who did or did not attend postnatal care (PNC). Women were followed for 50 days after delivery, with PM as the primary endpoint.

resultsUptake of recommended prenatal interventions was between 11-43% among ANC attenders, regardless of the frequency of their visits. PM was 26 per 1000. ANC attendance was associated with PM. Newborns of mothers who had the lowest attendance had a mortality two times higher than newborns of women who had not attended ANC (low visits: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 2.2; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.4-3.8). However, moderate (aOR = 1.4; 95% CI =0.7-2.2) and high (aOR = 1.3; 95% CI 0.7-2.2) attendance were not statistically significantly associated with PM. PNC attendance was not significantly associated with lower PM (relative risk 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-2.6). Emergency obstetric and newborn care (EmONC) was significantly associated with a reduction in mortality (aOR = 0.2; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8), with an 84.4% reduction among newborns at risk, and an overall reduction in mortality of 10% for all births.

conclusionPerinatal mortality was high among the infants of women in the cohort under study (26 per 1000 live births). Availability of MNCH, specifically EmONC, was associated with lower perinatal mortality, and if this association is causal, might avert 84.4% of perinatal deaths among newborns at high-risk.

Indexed as

Perinatal MortalityAdultDemocratic Republic of the CongoFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyProspective StudiesRisk FactorsDemocratic Republic of the CongoEmergency obstetric and neonatal careMaternal health servicesPerinatal carePerinatal mortalityPostnatal care

Identifiers

PMID27118184
PMCPMC4847211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.