Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27118088›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Classification of schizophrenia and bipolar patients using static and dynamic resting-state fMRI brain connectivity.

Barnaly Rashid, Mohammad R Arbabshirani, Eswar Damaraju, Mustafa S Cetin, Robyn Miller, Godfrey D Pearlson, Vince D Calhoun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 181 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
181citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

181 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 373 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Effects of light on brain-state dynamics and energy landscape.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

121 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Barnaly RashidThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Mohammad R ArbabshiraniThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; Geisinger Health System, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA.
Eswar DamarajuThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Mustafa S CetinThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; Department of Computer Science, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Robyn MillerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Godfrey D PearlsonOlin Neuropsychiatry Research Center, Institute of Living, Hartford, Connecticut, USA; Departments of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network & LBERI, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA; Departments of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; Department of Computer Science, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA. Electronic address: vcalhoun@mrn.org.
Mind Research Network · USUniversity of New Mexico · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Auditory Verbal HalluciP20GM103472 · NIGMS · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2012 to 2017
$14.3M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
NEURAL MECHANISMS OF SCHIZOPHRENIAP20RR021938 · NCRR · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2008 to 2011
$9.4M
Multi-group semi-blind ICA of fMRIR01EB000840 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2003 to 2011
$3.2M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
Integration of brain imaging with genomic and epigenomic dataR01MH104680 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, DENG, HONG-WEN · 2014 to 2017
$2.1M
Integration of fMRI imaging, genomics, network and biological knowledgeR01MH107354 · NIMH · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI WANG, YU-PING · 2015 to 2018
$1.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR021938NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000840NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103472NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH104680NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH107354
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, functional network connectivity (FNC, defined as the temporal correlation among spatially distant brain networks) has been used to examine the functional organization of brain networks in various psychiatric illnesses. Dynamic FNC is a recent extension of the conventional FNC analysis that takes into account FNC changes over short periods of time. While such dynamic FNC measures may be more informative about various aspects of connectivity, there has been no detailed head-to-head comparison of the ability of static and dynamic FNC to perform classification in complex mental illnesses. This paper proposes a framework for automatic classification of schizophrenia, bipolar and healthy subjects based on their static and dynamic FNC features. Also, we compare cross-validated classification performance between static and dynamic FNC. Results show that the dynamic FNC significantly outperforms the static FNC in terms of predictive accuracy, indicating that features from dynamic FNC have distinct advantages over static FNC for classification purposes. Moreover, combining static and dynamic FNC features does not significantly improve the classification performance over the dynamic FNC features alone, suggesting that static FNC does not add any significant information when combined with dynamic FNC for classification purposes. A three-way classification methodology based on static and dynamic FNC features discriminates individual subjects into appropriate diagnostic groups with high accuracy. Our proposed classification framework is potentially applicable to additional mental disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBipolar DisorderBrainBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPattern Recognition, AutomatedSchizophreniaSensitivity and SpecificityBipolarClassificationDynamic functional network connectivityfMRIResting-stateSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID27118088
PMCPMC4912868
OpenAlexW2336687820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.