ArticleBMC genomics2016
Consensus pan-genome assembly of the specialised wine bacterium Oenococcus oeni.
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic Analysis of an Excellent Wine-Making StrainPolish journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Distribution of Prophages in theMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Article
- Expanding the biodiversity of Oenococcus oeni through comparative genomics of apple cider and kombucha strains.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Distribution of Oenococcus oeni populations in natural habitats.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Shotgun Metagenomics of a Water Kefir Fermentation Ecosystem Reveals a NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Mapping the Physiological Response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
- Article
- Comparative Genome Analysis ofThe plant pathology journal · 2017Article
- Molecular Cloning, Expression and Characterization of Oenococcus oeni Priming Glycosyltransferases.Molecular biotechnology · 2017Article
- Microorganisms in Fermented Apple Beverages: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.Microorganisms · 2017Review
- Biogeography of Oenococcus oeni Reveals Distinctive but Nonspecific Populations in Wine-Producing Regions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2017Article
- Carbohydrate metabolism in Oenococcus oeni: a genomic insight.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Erratum to: 'Consensus pan-genome assembly of the specialised wine bacterium Oenococcus oeni'.BMC genomics · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOenococcus oeni is a lactic acid bacterium that is specialised for growth in the ecological niche of wine, where it is noted for its ability to perform the secondary, malolactic fermentation that is often required for many types of wine. Expanding the understanding of strain-dependent genetic variations in its small and streamlined genome is important for realising its full potential in industrial fermentation processes.
resultsWhole genome comparison was performed on 191 strains of O. oeni; from this rich source of genomic information consensus pan-genome assemblies of the invariant (core) and variable (flexible) regions of this organism were established. Genetic variation in amino acid biosynthesis and sugar transport and utilisation was found to be common between strains. Furthermore, we characterised previously-unreported intra-specific genetic variations in the natural competence of this microbe.
conclusionBy assembling a consensus pan-genome from a large number of strains, this study provides a tool for researchers to readily compare protein-coding genes across strains and infer functional relationships between genes in conserved syntenic regions. This establishes a foundation for further genetic, and thus phenotypic, research of this industrially-important species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.