Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27118011›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2016

Telemedicine Use in Rural Native American Communities in the Era of the ACA: a Systematic Literature Review.

Clemens Scott Kruse, Shelby Bouffard, Michael Dougherty, Jenna Stewart Parro

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Rural-Urban and Racial-Ethnic Differences in Tele-Behavioral Health Access for Medicaid Beneficiaries.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Use of telehealth did not mitigate persistent disparities in prenatal care access among American Indian women in North Dakota.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Advancing Liver Cancer Prevention for American Indian Populations in Arizona: An Integrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Factors Associated with Arkansans' First Use of Telehealth during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of telemedicine and applications · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clemens Scott KruseSchool of Health Administration, Texas State University - San Marcos, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA. s_k97@txstate.edu.
Shelby BouffardSchool of Health Administration, Texas State University - San Marcos, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA.
Michael DoughertySchool of Health Administration, Texas State University - San Marcos, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA.
Jenna Stewart ParroSchool of Health Administration, Texas State University - San Marcos, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX, 78666, USA.
Texas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Native American communities face serious health disparities and, living in rural areas, often lack regular access to healthcare services as compared to other Americans. Since the early 1970's, telecommunication technology has been explored as a means to address the cost and quality of, as well as access to, healthcare on rural reservations. This systematic review seeks to explore the use of telemedicine in rural Native American communities using the framework of cost, quality, and access as promulgated by the Affordable Care Act of 2010 and urge additional legislation to increase its use in this vulnerable population. As a systematic literature review, this study analyzes 15 peer-reviewed articles from four databases using the themes of cost, quality, and access. The theme of access was referenced most frequently in the reviewed literature, indicating that access to healthcare may be the biggest obstacle facing widespread adoption of telemedicine programs on rural Native American reservations. The use of telemedicine mitigates the costs of healthcare, which impede access to high-quality care delivery and, in some cases, deters prospective patients from accessing healthcare at all. Telemedicine offers rural Native American communities a means of accessing healthcare without incurring high costs. With attention to reimbursement policies, educational services, technological infrastructure, and culturally competent care, telemedicine has the potential to decrease costs, increase quality, and increase access to healthcare for rural Native American patients. While challenges facing the implementation of telemedicine programs exist, there is great potential for it to improve healthcare delivery in rural Native American communities. Public policy that increases funding for programs that help to expand access to healthcare for Native Americans will improve outcomes because of the increase in access.

Indexed as

Indians, North AmericanPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActRural PopulationTelemedicineHumansNative Americans (Indians, North American)Patient Protection and Affordable Care ActRural populationTelehealthTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID27118011
PMCPMC4848328
OpenAlexW2344231592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.