Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27117940›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2016

The clinical value of metabolic syndrome and risks of cardiometabolic events and mortality in the elderly: the Rotterdam study.

Thijs T W van Herpt, Abbas Dehghan, Mandy van Hoek, M Arfan Ikram, Albert Hofman, Eric J G Sijbrands, Oscar H Franco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thijs T W van HerptDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Abbas DehghanDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. a.dehghan@erasmusmc.nl.
Mandy van HoekDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
M Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Albert HofmanDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Eric J G SijbrandsDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Oscar H FrancoDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the clinical value of metabolic syndrome based on different definitions [American Heart Association/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (AHA/NHLBI), International Diabetes Federation (IDF) and European Group for the Study of Insulin Resistance (EGIR)] in middle-aged and elderly populations.

methodsWe studied 8643 participants from the Rotterdam study (1990-2012; mean age 62.7; 57.6 % female), a large prospective population-based study with predominantly elderly participants. We performed cox-proportional hazards models for different definitions, triads within definitions and each separate component for the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus, coronary heart disease, stroke, cardiovascular- and all-cause mortality.

resultsIn our population of 8643 subjects, metabolic syndrome was highly prevalent (prevalence between 19.4 and 42.4 %). Metabolic syndrome in general was associated with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (median follow-up of 6.8 years, hazard ratios 3.13-3.78). The associations with coronary heart disease (median follow-up of 7.2 years, hazard ratios 1.08-1.32), stroke (median follow-up of 7.7 years, hazard ratios 0.98-1.32), cardiovascular mortality (median follow-up of 8.2 years, ratios 0.95-1.29) and all-cause mortality (median follow-up of 8.7 years, hazard ratios 1.05-1.10) were weaker. AHA/NHLBI- and IDF-definitions showed similar associations with clinical endpoints compared to the EGIR, which was only significantly associated with incident type 2 diabetes mellitus. All significant associations disappeared after correcting metabolic syndrome for its individual components.

conclusionsLarge variability exists between and within definitions of the metabolic syndrome with respect to risk of clinical events and mortality. In a relatively old population the metabolic syndrome did not show an additional predictive value on top of its individual components. So, besides as a manner of easy identification of high risk patients, the metabolic syndrome does not seem to add any predictive value for clinical practice.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary DiseaseDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansInsulin ResistanceMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk FactorsUnited StatesWhite PeopleAll-cause mortalityCardiovascular diseaseCardiovascular mortalityDiabetes mellitusMetabolic syndromePreventive medicineRotterdam studyStroke

Identifiers

PMID27117940
PMCPMC4847340
OpenAlexW2344986522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.