Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27117654›Full record

ReviewSeminars in immunology2015

Macrophages and cellular immunity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Katrina S Gold, Katja Brückner

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Drosophila as a Model for Metastasis.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The macrophage genetic cassetteScience advances · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Growth deregulation and interaction with host hemocytes contribute to tumor progression in a Drosophila brain tumor model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katrina S GoldDepartment of Cell and Tissue Biology.
Katja BrücknerEli and Edythe Broad Center of Regeneration Medicine and Stem Cell Research; Department of Cell and Tissue Biology; Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States. Electronic address: katja.brueckner@ucsf.edu.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Regulation of cell signaling and developmental adaptation by sensory stimulationR01GM112083 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BRUECKNER, KATJA · 2014 to 2018
$1.5M
Mechanisms of hematopoietic regulation by the nervous systemR56HL118726 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BRUECKNER, KATJA · 2014 to 2014
$395k
NHLBI NIH HHS R56 HL118726NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The invertebrate Drosophila melanogaster has been a powerful model for understanding blood cell development and immunity. Drosophila is a holometabolous insect, which transitions through a series of life stages from embryo, larva and pupa to adulthood. In spite of this, remarkable parallels exist between Drosophila and vertebrate macrophages, both in terms of development and function. More than 90% of Drosophila blood cells (hemocytes) are macrophages (plasmatocytes), making this highly tractable genetic system attractive for studying a variety of questions in macrophage biology. In vertebrates, recent findings revealed that macrophages have two independent origins: self-renewing macrophages, which reside and proliferate in local microenvironments in a variety of tissues, and macrophages of the monocyte lineage, which derive from hematopoietic stem or progenitor cells. Like vertebrates, Drosophila possesses two macrophage lineages with a conserved dual ontogeny. These parallels allow us to take advantage of the Drosophila model when investigating macrophage lineage specification, maintenance and amplification, and the induction of macrophages and their progenitors by local microenvironments and systemic cues. Beyond macrophage development, Drosophila further serves as a paradigm for understanding the mechanisms underlying macrophage function and cellular immunity in infection, tissue homeostasis and cancer, throughout development and adult life.

Indexed as

Immunity, CellularAnimalsBlood CellsCell LineageDrosophila melanogasterMacrophagesAntimicrobial peptideCrystal cellDevelopmentDrosophila melanogasterHematopoiesisHematopoietic pocketsHemocyteImmunityInnate immunityLamellocyteLymph glandMacrophageMicroenvironmentMonocytePlasmatocyteSelf-renewing tissue macrophageSignaling pathwaySystemic signal

Identifiers

PMID27117654
PMCPMC5012540
OpenAlexW2345067109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.