Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27117585›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

Bacterial superglue enables easy development of efficient virus-like particle based vaccines.

Susan Thrane, Christoph M Janitzek, Sungwa Matondo, Mafalda Resende, Tobias Gustavsson, Willem Adriaan de Jongh, Stine Clemmensen, Will Roeffen, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer, Geert Jan van Gemert and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. First-in-human, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial of Differentially Adjuvanted PAMVAC, A Vaccine Candidate to Prevent Pregnancy-associated Malaria.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. EngineeringVaccines · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Susan ThraneCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christoph M JanitzekCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sungwa MatondoKilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, KCMC, Moshi, Tanzania.
Mafalda ResendeCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tobias GustavssonCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Willem Adriaan de JonghExpreS2ion Biotechnologies, SCION-DTU Science Park, Hørsholm, Denmark.
Stine ClemmensenCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Will RoeffenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marga van de Vegte-BolmerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Geert Jan van GemertDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert SauerweinDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
John T SchillerLaboratory of Cellular Oncology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Morten A NielsenCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Thor G TheanderCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ali SalantiCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. salanti@sund.ku.dk.
Adam F SanderCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. adamsander@gmail.com.

Funding

Understanding Papillomavirus Virion Proteins and VaccinesZIABC009052 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI SCHILLER, JOHN T. · 2009 to 2025
$38.4M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirus-like particles (VLPs) represent a significant advance in the development of subunit vaccines, combining high safety and efficacy. Their particulate nature and dense repetitive subunit organization makes them ideal scaffolds for display of vaccine antigens. Traditional approaches for VLP-based antigen display require labor-intensive trial-and-error optimization, and often fail to generate dense antigen display. Here we utilize the split-intein (SpyTag/SpyCatcher) conjugation system to generate stable isopeptide bound antigen-VLP complexes by simply mixing of the antigen and VLP components.

resultsGenetic fusion of SpyTag or SpyCatcher to the N-terminus and/or C-terminus of the Acinetobacter phage AP205 capsid protein resulted in formation of stable, nonaggregated VLPs expressing one SpyCatcher, one SpyTag or two SpyTags per capsid protein. Mixing of spy-VLPs with eleven different vaccine antigens fused to SpyCatcher or SpyTag resulted in formation of antigen-VLP complexes with coupling efficiencies (% occupancy of total VLP binding sites) ranging from 22-88 %. In mice, spy-VLP vaccines presenting the malaria proteins Pfs25 or VAR2CSA markedly increased antibody titer, affinity, longevity and functional efficacy compared to corresponding vaccines employing monomeric proteins. The spy-VLP vaccines also effectively broke B cell self-tolerance and induced potent and durable antibody responses upon vaccination with cancer or allergy-associated self-antigens (PD-L1, CTLA-4 and IL-5).

conclusionsThe spy-VLP system constitutes a versatile and rapid method to develop highly immunogenic VLP-based vaccines. Our data provide proof-of-concept for the technology's ability to present complex vaccine antigens to the immune system and elicit robust functional antibody responses as well as to efficiently break B cell self-tolerance. The spy-VLP-system may serve as a generic tool for the cost-effective development of effective VLP-vaccines against both infectious- and non-communicable diseases and could facilitate rapid and unbiased screening of vaccine candidate antigens.

Indexed as

AcinetobacterAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacteriophagesB-LymphocytesCapsid ProteinsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLVaccinationVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleAntigens, BacterialCapsid ProteinsVaccines, Virus-Like Particle

Identifiers

PMID27117585
PMCPMC4847360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.