Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27117271›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2016

Factors associated with pre-ART loss-to-follow up in adults in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a prospective cohort study.

Michael Evangeli, Marie-Louise Newell, Nuala McGrath

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prevalence and predictors of late presentation for HIV care in South Africa.South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde · 2017
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael EvangeliDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham Hill, Egham, Surrey, London, TW20 0EX, UK. michael.evangeli@rhul.ac.uk.
Marie-Louise NewellAfrica Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, South Africa.
Nuala McGrathAfrica Centre for Health and Population Studies, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Somkhele, South Africa.
Royal Holloway University of London · GBUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT083495MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTimely initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) requires sustained engagement in HIV care before treatment eligibility. We assessed loss to follow-up (LTFU) correlates in HIV-positive adults accessing HIV treatment and care, not yet ART-eligible (CD4 >500 cells/mm(3)).

methodsThis was a sub-study of a prospective cohort study (focusing on sexual behaviour) in an area of high HIV prevalence and widespread ART availability in rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Psychosocial, clinical and demographic data were collected at recruitment from individuals with CD4 >500 cells/mm(3). LTFU was defined as not attending clinic within 13 months of last visit or before death. Individuals starting ART were censored at ART initiation. Data were collected between January 2009 and January 2013. Analysis used Competing Risks regression.

resultsTwo hundred forty-seven individuals (212 females) were recruited (median follow-up 2.13 years, total follow-up 520.15 person-years). 86 remained in pre-ART care (34.8 %), 94 were LTFU (38.1 %), 58 initiated ART (23.5 %), 7 died (2.8 %), 2 transferred out (0.8 %). The LTFU rate was 18.07 per 100 person-years (95 % CI 14.76-21.12). LTFU before a competing event was 13.5 % at one and 34.4 % at three years. Lower LTFU rates were significantly associated with age (>37 versus ≤37 years: adjusted sub-Hazard ratio (aSHR) 0.51, 95 % CI 0.30-0.87), openness with family/friends (a little versus not at all, aSHR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.45-1.43; a lot versus not at all, aSHR 1.57, 95 % CI 0.94-2.62), children (0 versus 4+, aSHR 0.68, 95 % CI 0.24-1.87; 1 versus 4+, aSHR 2.05 95 % CI 1.14-3.69, 2 versus 4+; aSHR 1.71, 95 % CI 0.94-3.09; 3 versus 4a, aSHR 1.14, 95 % CI 0.57-2.30), previous CD4 counts (1 versus 0, aSHR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.45-1.43; 2+ versus 0, aSHR 0.43, 95 % CI 0.25-0.73), and most recent partner HIV status (not known versus HIV-positive, aSHR 0.77, 95 % CI 0.50-1.19; HIV-negative versus HIV-positive, aSHR 2.40, 95 % CI 1.18-4.88). The interaction between openness with family/friends and HIV partner disclosure was close to significance (p = 0.06). Those who had neither disclosed to partners nor were open with family/friends had lowest LTFU rates.

conclusionsStrategies to retain younger people in pre-ART care are required. How openness with others, partner HIV status and disclosure, and children relate to LTFU needs further exploration.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDisclosureHIV InfectionsLost to Follow-UpSexual PartnersSocial SupportAdultCD4 Lymphocyte CountContinuity of Patient CareFamilyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFriendsHealth FacilitiesHumansMaleHIVLoss-to-follow upPre-ARTPsychosocialSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID27117271
PMCPMC4847371
OpenAlexW2344725745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.