Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27117188›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

Comparison of French training and non-training general practices: a cross-sectional study.

Laurent Letrilliart, Pauline Rigault-Fossier, Benoit Fossier, Nadir Kellou, Françoise Paumier, Christophe Bois, Stéphanie Polazzi, Anne-Marie Schott, Yves Zerbib

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. General practice in the EU: countries you see, customs you find.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent LetrilliartUniversite de Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Lyon, France. laurent.letrilliart@univ-lyon1.fr.
Pauline Rigault-FossierUniversite de Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Lyon, France.
Benoit FossierUniversite de Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Lyon, France.
Nadir KellouUniversite de Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Lyon, France.
Françoise PaumierDépartement de médicine générale, Universite de Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Christophe BoisDépartement de médicine générale, Universite de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Stéphanie PolazziHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle IMER, Lyon, France.
Anne-Marie SchottUniversite de Lyon, Equipe d'Accueil HESPER 7425, Lyon, France.
Yves ZerbibUniversite de Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs the medicine practiced in hospital settings has become more specialized, training in primary care is becoming increasingly essential for medical students, especially for future general practitioners (GPs). Only a few limited studies have investigated the representativeness of medical practices delivering this training. The aim of this study was to assess the representativeness of French GP trainers in terms of socio-demographics, patients and activities.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study covering all private GPs practicing in the Rhône-Alpes region of France in 2011. This population consisted of 4992 GPs, including 623 trainers and 4369 non-trainers, managing 8,198,684 individual patients. Data from 2011 to 2012 were provided by the Regional Health Care Insurance (RHCI). We compared GP trainers with non-trainers using the Pearson chi-square test for qualitative variables and the Student t-test for quantitative variables

resultsGP trainers do not differ from non-trainers for gender, but they tend to be younger, more frequently in mid-career, and more likely to practice in a rural area. Their patients are broadly representative of patients attending general practice for age (with the exception of a higher consultation rate for infants), but patients with medical fee exemption status relating to low income are underrepresented. GP trainers have a heavier workload in terms of office visits and on-call duties. They prescribe a higher proportion of generic drugs, perform more electrocardiograms and cervical smears, and fewer plaster casts. GP trainers show better performance in diabetes follow-up, and to a lesser extent for seasonal flu vaccination and mammograms.

conclusionsGPs and patients of training practices are globally representative, which is particularly critical in countries such as France, where the length of specialty training in a general practice setting is still limited to a few months. In addition, GP trainers tend to have better clinical performance, which conforms to their teaching modelling role and may encourage other GPs to become trainers.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFranceGeneral PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Socioeconomic FactorsWorkloadYoung AdultFrenchGeneral practicePerformanceRepresentativenessTraining practices

Identifiers

PMID27117188
PMCPMC4847255
OpenAlexW2344734568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.