Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27117144›Full record

Trial reportEndocrine2016

Effect of DHA supplementation in a very low-calorie ketogenic diet in the treatment of obesity: a randomized clinical trial.

Daniel de Luis, Joan Carles Domingo, Olatz Izaola, Felipe F Casanueva, Diego Bellido, Ignacio Sajoux

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Endocrine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Effect ofJournal of nutritional science
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel de LuisDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, School of Medicine, Center of Investigation of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clinico Universitario Valladolid, University of Valladolid, C/los perales 16, 47130, Simancas, Spain. dluisro@saludcastillayleon.es.
Joan Carles DomingoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Biology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Olatz IzaolaDepartment of Endocrinology and Nutrition, School of Medicine, Center of Investigation of Endocrinology and Nutrition, Hospital Clinico Universitario Valladolid, University of Valladolid, C/los perales 16, 47130, Simancas, Spain.
Felipe F CasanuevaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela University and CIBER Fisiopatología Nutrición y Obesidad, Santiago De Compostela, Spain.
Diego BellidoDivision of Endocrinology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol and Coruña University, Ferrol, Spain.
Ignacio SajouxMedical Department Pronokal Group, PronokalGroup, Barcelona, Spain.
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago · ESComplexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña · ESHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESPronoKal Group (Spain) · ESUniversidad de Valladolid · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A VLCK diet supplemented with DHA, commercially available, was tested against an isocaloric VLCK diet without DHA. The main purpose of this study was to compare the effect of DHA supplementation in classic cardiovascular risk factors, adipokine levels, and inflammation-resolving eicosanoids. A total of obese patients were randomized into two groups: a group supplemented with DHA (n = 14) (PnK-DHA group) versus a group with an isocaloric diet free of supplementation (n = 15) (control group). The follow-up period was 6 months. The average weight loss after 6 months of treatment was 20.36 ± 5.02 kg in control group and 19.74 ± 5.10 kg in PnK-DHA group, without statistical differences between both groups. The VLCK diets induced a significant change in some of the biological parameters, such as insulin, HOMA-IR, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, resistin, TNF alpha, and leptin. Following DHA supplementation, the DHA-derived oxylipins were significantly increased in the intervention group. The ratio of proresolution/proinflammatory lipid markers was increased in plasma of the intervention group over the entire study. Similarly, the mean ratios of AA/EPA and AA/DHA in erythrocyte membranes were dramatically reduced in the PnK-DHA group and the anti-inflammatory fatty acid index (AIFAI) was consistently increased after the DHA treatment (p < 0.05). The present study demonstrated that a very low-calorie ketogenic diet supplemented with DHA was significantly superior in the anti-inflammatory effect, without statistical differences in weight loss and metabolic improvement.

Indexed as

Caloric RestrictionDietary SupplementsDiet, KetogenicAdultBlood GlucoseDocosahexaenoic AcidsFemaleHumansInsulinInsulin ResistanceLipidsMaleMiddle AgedObesityTreatment OutcomeTriglyceridesBlood GlucoseDocosahexaenoic AcidsInsulinLipidsTriglyceridesDHAKetosisPnK methodPronokal methodProtein dietWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID27117144
OpenAlexW2344139418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.