Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27116947›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2016

Success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Masahiro Fujimoto, Ken Ogino, Hiroko Matsuyama, Chika Miyazaki

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: clinical guideline.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Can preoperative lacrimal endoscopic evaluation change the paradigm of conventional lacrimal surgery?Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Minimally invasive diagnostics and therapy of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiro FujimotoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawaracho, Sakyou, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. m2fjmt@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Ken OginoDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawaracho, Sakyou, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Hiroko MatsuyamaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Chika MiyazakiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Hyogo Prefectural Amagasaki General Medical Center, Hyogo, Japan.
Kyoto University · JPNoguchi Hospital · JPShizuoka General Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOur aim was to review the success rates of dacryoendoscopy-guided probing for recalcitrant congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

methodsWe reviewed the medical records of 498 patients (521 eyes) diagnosed with CNLDO between January 2011 and November 2013. Of these, 54 eyes met the eligibility criteria and underwent probing with a dacryoendoscope.

resultsOf the 54 eyes, 21 were classified as failed cases at other hospitals, 13 as cases requiring conversion from blind to dacryoendoscopy-guided probing during surgery at our hospital, and 20 as cases requiring intervention under general anesthesia because of difficulty with topical anesthesia. The overall success rate with dacryoendoscopy was 98.1 % (53/54 eyes) at postoperative week 2 and 97.1 % (33/34 eyes) a year after surgery. Among the cases that failed at other hospitals, one showed the formation of five false passages in the middle area of the nasolacrimal duct. In 11 eyes, slit-like adhesion was confirmed as a blurred linear line at the distal end of the nasolacrimal duct. Patency could be smoothly achieved by releasing the adhesion.

conclusionsOur study showed a high success rate for dacryoendoscopy-guided probing in CNLDO patients. The use of a dacryoendoscope allows direct visualization of the lacrimal passage and is likely to become necessary for managing CNLDO.

Indexed as

Child, PreschoolDacryocystorhinostomyEndoscopyFemaleHumansInfantLacrimal Duct ObstructionMaleNasolacrimal DuctRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeCongenital nasolacrimal duct obstructionDacryoendoscopeDacryoendoscopy-guided probingSuccess rate

Identifiers

PMID27116947
OpenAlexW2342969741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.