Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27116937›Full record

ReviewChild: care, health and development2016

Issues around childhood disclosure of HIV status - findings from a qualitative study in West Bengal, India.

A Das, R Detels, M Javanbakht, S Panda

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Child: care, health and development, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and its correlates among community-recruited children living with HIV and uninfected children born to HIV-infected parents in West Bengal, India.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A DasDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
R DetelsDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
M JavanbakhtDepartment of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
S PandaNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases (NICED/ICMR), Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health · USNational Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases · INUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA Fogarty AITRP-Supplement for North IndiaD43TW000013 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DETELS, ROGER · 1988 to 2012
$14.6M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW000013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInforming the children living with HIV (CLH) about their disease (disclosure) is important from the perspective of disease treatment and overall psychosocial development. There are no published studies that qualitatively explored HIV disclosure-related issues among CLH in India. Our aim was to provide insights into the perceptions of informal caregivers of CLH regarding childhood disclosure.

methodsChildren were defined as those aged <16 years. In-depth interviews were conducted with 34 primary caregivers of CLH aged 8 to 15 years old who were residing in West Bengal, India. The participants were recruited with the help of a community-based organization that provides need-based services to people living with HIV.

resultsWe obtained caregivers' perspectives on the motivators and barriers of childhood disclosure. Health benefits such as medication adherence emerged as an important motivator, while distress caused by disclosure and potential for stigma were identified as barriers. Health care providers were the preferred disclosers for most caregivers, followed by the caregivers themselves. Some caregivers wanted their child to learn about his/her HIV status by him/herself. There was no consensus among the caregivers about the ideal age for disclosure. Many preferred to wait until the child attained maturity or was of marriageable age. DISCUSSION: Disclosure of HIV status to children is an emotional issue, both for the caregiver and the child. Like most low-or middle-income countries, no standardized, age-appropriate disclosure guidelines exist in India. Our findings advocate adoption of a multi-faceted approach, including increased availability of social and familial support, for childhood HIV disclosure.

Indexed as

Social StigmaSocial SupportTruth DisclosureAdolescentAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveAttitude to HealthCaregiversChildChild BehaviorEmotionsFamilyFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansIndiaMaledisclosurediscriminationHIVpsychosocial developmentqualitative

Identifiers

PMID27116937
PMCPMC4913886
OpenAlexW2343358701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.