ArticlePloS one2016
Assessing DNA Barcodes for Species Identification in North American Reptiles and Amphibians in Natural History Collections.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Proteomic taxonomic identification can identify cryptic diversity of Squamata in modern and paleontological specimens.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Decoding the Peruvian Amazon with in situ DNA barcoding of vertebrate and plant taxa.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Unraveling the herpetofauna diversity in canga and forest ecosystems of the Eastern Amazon.PloS one · 2025Article
- Arctos: Community-driven innovations for managing natural and cultural history collections.PloS one · 2024Article
- Building a Teleost Fish Traceability Program Based on Genetic Data from Pacific Panama Fish Markets.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Enhancing DNA barcode reference libraries by harvesting terrestrial arthropods at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History.Biodiversity data journal · 2023Article
- Pragmatic Applications and Universality of DNA Barcoding for Substantial Organisms at Species Level: A Review to Explore a Way Forward.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Article
- Sex chromosomes in meiotic, hemiclonal, clonal and polyploid hybrid vertebrates: along the 'extended speciation continuum'.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021Review
- A new species ofZoological research · 2021Article
- Genetic diversity of the Pegu Rice Frog,Mitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
- Mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2021Article
- Article
- Molecular and morphometric divergence of four species of butterflies (Nymphalidae and Pieridae) from the Western Himalaya, India.Molecular biology reports · 2020Article
- DNA barcoding reveals distinct population ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2020Article
- Beyond DNA barcoding: The unrealized potential of genome skim data in sample identification.Molecular ecology · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- Distinguishing Anuran species by high-resolution melting analysis of the COI barcode (COI-HRM).Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh rates of species discovery and loss have led to the urgent need for more rapid assessment of species diversity in the herpetofauna. DNA barcoding allows for the preliminary identification of species based on sequence divergence. Prior DNA barcoding work on reptiles and amphibians has revealed higher biodiversity counts than previously estimated due to cases of cryptic and undiscovered species. Past studies have provided DNA barcodes for just 14% of the North American herpetofauna, revealing the need for expanded coverage. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsThis study extends the DNA barcode reference library for North American herpetofauna, assesses the utility of this approach in aiding species delimitation, and examines the correspondence between current species boundaries and sequence clusters designated by the BIN system. Sequences were obtained from 730 specimens, representing 274 species (43%) from the North American herpetofauna. Mean intraspecific divergences were 1% and 3%, while average congeneric sequence divergences were 16% and 14% in amphibians and reptiles, respectively. BIN assignments corresponded with current species boundaries in 79% of amphibians, 100% of turtles, and 60% of squamates. Deep divergences (>2%) were noted in 35% of squamate and 16% of amphibian species, and low divergences (<2%) occurred in 12% of reptiles and 23% of amphibians, patterns reflected in BIN assignments. Sequence recovery declined with specimen age, and variation in recovery success was noted among collections. Within collections, barcodes effectively flagged seven mislabeled tissues, and barcode fragments were recovered from five formalin-fixed specimens. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that DNA barcodes can effectively flag errors in museum collections, while BIN splits and merges reveal taxa belonging to deeply diverged or hybridizing lineages. This study is the first effort to compile a reference library of DNA barcodes for herpetofauna on a continental scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.