Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27115951›Full record

ReviewAnnals of the American Thoracic Society2016

Mucus Hyperconcentration as a Unifying Aspect of the Chronic Bronchitic Phenotype.

Brian Button, Wayne H Anderson, Richard C Boucher

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Insights on the Pathogenesis ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Design of the SPIROMICS Study of Early COPD Progression: SOURCE Study.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2024
    Article
  9. Emerging cell and molecular targets for treating mucus hypersecretion in asthma.Allergology international : official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. FightingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. E-cigarette aerosols of propylene glycol impair BK channel activity and parameters of mucociliary function.American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brian Button1 Marsico Lung Institute/Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, Department of Medicine, and.
Wayne H Anderson2 Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Richard C Boucher1 Marsico Lung Institute/Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, Department of Medicine, and.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USCystic Fibrosis Research Foundation · IT

Funding

Vector CoreP30DK065988 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Martina Gentzsch · 2004 to 2026
$26.5M
The Biophysics of Mucus Hydration and Adhesion/CohesionP01HL108808 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RUBINSTEIN, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$23.9M
The Mucus Transport Apparatus: Why Two Layers?P50HL084934 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BOUCHER, RICHARD CHARLES · 2006 to 2010
$15.6M
The role of mucus and pulmonary surface interactions in lung defenseR01HL125280 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUTTON, BRIAN M · 2015 to 2023
$3.1M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL108808NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL084934NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL125280NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK065988
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormalities in mucus production and qualitative properties such as mucus hydration are central to the pathophysiology of airway disease including cystic fibrosis, asthma, and chronic bronchitis. In vitro air-liquid interface epithelial cell cultures demonstrate direct relationships between mucociliary transport, periciliary liquid (PCL) height, and mucus concentration (expressed as percent solids or partial osmotic pressure). In health, the osmotic modulus/pressure of the PCL exceeds that of the mucus layer, resulting in efficient, low-friction movement of mucus. In disease, through multiple mechanisms, the osmotic pressure of the mucus begins to exceed basal PCL values, resulting in compression of the cilia and slowing of mucus transport. The in vivo data in both cystic fibrosis and chronic bronchitis parallel in vitro data demonstrating that when mucus osmotic pressure is increased, mucociliary clearance is decreased. In chronic bronchitis, there is a direct correlation between FEV1 and percent solids of mucus, demonstrating a strong relationship between disease progression and mucus abnormalities. Animal models, based mechanistically on raised sodium absorption (and therefore water absorption) from airway surfaces, mimic the pathophysiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Collectively, these data suggest the importance of mucus concentration in the pathogenesis of airway disease. It is important to understand the precise mechanisms that result in mucus hyperconcentration, for example, mucin overproduction versus abnormal regulation of ion/water transport, which may be unique to and characteristic of each disease phenotype. The measurement of mucus concentration may be a simple method to diagnose chronic bronchitis, monitor its progression, and serve as a biomarker for development of new therapies.

Indexed as

Mucociliary ClearanceBronchitis, ChronicCiliaCystic FibrosisEpithelial CellsHumansMucusOsmotic PressurePhenotypeSodiumSodiumchronic bronchitismucociliary clearancemucusosmotic pressure

Identifiers

PMID27115951
PMCPMC5015722
OpenAlexW2342851644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.