Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27115880›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

The Role of Cognitive Factors in Predicting Balance and Fall Risk in a Neuro-Rehabilitation Setting.

A Saverino, D Waller, K Rantell, R Parry, A Moriarty, E D Playford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Screening recall in older cancer survivors detects differences in balance and mobility.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Post-stroke cognitive impairments and responsiveness to motor rehabilitation: A review.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

A SaverinoTherapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
D WallerTherapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
K RantellResearch Support Centre, Joint UCL/UCLH/Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
R ParryTherapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
A MoriartyTherapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.
E D PlayfordTherapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere is a consistent body of evidence supporting the role of cognitive functions, particularly executive function, in the elderly and in neurological conditions which become more frequent with ageing. The aim of our study was to assess the role of different domains of cognitive functions to predict balance and fall risk in a sample of adults with various neurological conditions in a rehabilitation setting.

methodsThis was a prospective, cohort study conducted in a single centre in the UK. 114 participants consecutively admitted to a Neuro-Rehabilitation Unit were prospectively assessed for fall accidents. Baseline assessment included a measure of balance (Berg Balance Scale) and a battery of standard cognitive tests measuring executive function, speed of information processing, verbal and visual memory, visual perception and intellectual function. The outcomes of interest were the risk of becoming a faller, balance and fall rate.

resultsTwo tests of executive function were significantly associated with fall risk, the Stroop Colour Word Test (IRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03) and the number of errors on part B of the Trail Making Test (IRR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03-1.49). Composite scores of executive function, speed of information processing and visual memory domains resulted in 2 to 3 times increased likelihood of having better balance (OR 2.74 95% CI 1.08 to 6.94, OR 2.72 95% CI 1.16 to 6.36 and OR 2.44 95% CI 1.11 to 5.35 respectively).

conclusionsOur results show that specific subcomponents of executive functions are able to predict fall risk, while a more global cognitive dysfunction is associated with poorer balance.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsAdultAgingCognitionCohort StudiesExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesNeurological RehabilitationNeuropsychological TestsPostural BalanceProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID27115880
PMCPMC4846032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.