ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016
Mipsagargin, a novel thapsigargin-based PSMA-activated prodrug: results of a first-in-man phase I clinical trial in patients with refractory, advanced or metastatic solid tumours.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.
- Organelle-Resolved Tetrazine-trans-Cyclooctene Click Chemistry for Cargo Delivery and Release.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Advances in Naturally and Synthetically Derived Bioactive Sesquiterpenes and Their Derivatives: Applications in Targeting Cancer and Neurodegenerative Diseases.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Allosteric Modulation of SERCA Pumps in Health and Disease: Structural Dynamics, Posttranslational Modifications, and Therapeutic Potential.Journal of molecular biology · 2025Review
- Targeting Ion Channels for Cancer Therapy: From Pathophysiological Mechanisms to Clinical Translation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Modulation of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Experimental Anti-Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prodrugs Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen against Prostate Cancer.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Current progress and remaining challenges of peptide-drug conjugates (PDCs): next generation of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs)?Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
- Sesquiterpene Lactones as Promising Anti-Glioblastoma Drug Candidates Exerting Complex Effects on Glioblastoma Cell Viability and Proneural-Mesenchymal Transition.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Targeting SERCA2 in Anti-Tumor Drug Discovery.Current drug targets · 2025Review
- Monitoring ER CaMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Thapsigargin and its prodrug derivatives: exploring novel approaches for targeted cancer therapy through calcium signaling disruption.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Combining Photodynamic Therapy and Targeted Drug Delivery Systems: Enhancing Mitochondrial Toxicity for Improved Cancer Outcomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Stimuli-responsive peptide assemblies: Design, self-assembly, modulation, and biomedical applications.Bioactive materials · 2024Review
- ER stress elicits non-canonical CASP8 (caspase 8) activation on autophagosomal membranes to induce apoptosis.Autophagy · 2024Article
- Calcium channels as therapeutic targets in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: current evidence and clinical trials.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Article
- Calcium signalling pathways in prostate cancer initiation and progression.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- The 3q OncogeneInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway: the unsung hero in breast cancer management.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2023Review
- Elevation of Cytoplasmic Calcium Suppresses Microtentacle Formation and Function in Breast Tumor Cells.Cancers · 2023Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMipsagargin (G-202; (8-O-(12-aminododecanoyl)-8-O-debutanoyl thapsigargin)-Asp-γ-Glu-γ-Glu-γ-GluGluOH)) is a novel thapsigargin-based targeted prodrug that is activated by PSMA-mediated cleavage of an inert masking peptide. The active moiety is an inhibitor of the sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum calcium adenosine triphosphatase (SERCA) pump protein that is necessary for cellular viability. We evaluated the safety of mipsagargin in patients with advanced solid tumours and established a recommended phase II dosing (RP2D) regimen.
methodsPatients with advanced solid tumours received mipsagargin by intravenous infusion on days 1, 2 and 3 of 28-day cycles and were allowed to continue participation in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The dosing began at 1.2 mg m(-2) and was escalated using a modified Fibonacci schema to determine maximally tolerated dose (MTD) with an expansion cohort at the RP2D. Plasma was analysed for mipsagargin pharmacokinetics and response was assessed using RECIST criteria.
resultsA total of 44 patients were treated at doses ranging from 1.2 to 88 mg m(-2), including 28 patients in the dose escalation phase and 16 patients in an expansion cohort. One dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; Grade 3 rash) was observed in the dose escalation portion of the study. At 88 mg m(-2), observations of Grade 2 infusion-related reaction (IRR, 2 patients) and Grade 2 creatinine elevation (1 patient) led to declaration of 66.8 mg m(-2) as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Across the study, the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue, rash, nausea, pyrexia and IRR. Two patients developed treatment-related Grade 3 acute renal failure that was reversible during the treatment-free portion of the cycle. To help ameliorate the IRR and creatinine elevations, a RP2D of 40 mg m(-2) on day 1 and 66.8 mg m(-2) on days 2 and 3 with prophylactic premedications and hydration on each day of infusion was established. Clinical response was not observed, but prolonged disease stabilisation was observed in a subset of patients.
conclusionsMipsagargin demonstrated an acceptable tolerability and favourable pharmacokinetic profile in patients with solid tumours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.