Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27115567›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2016

Quality of life, long-term survivors and long-term outcome from the ABC-02 study.

John Bridgewater, Andre Lopes, Daniel Palmer, David Cunningham, Alan Anthoney, Anthony Maraveyas, Srinivasan Madhusudan, Tim Iveson, Juan Valle, Harpreet Wasan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

John BridgewaterUCL Cancer Institute, UCL, London WC1E 6DD, UK.
Andre LopesUCL and CRUK Clinical Trials Centre, UCL, London W1T 4TJ, UK.
Daniel PalmerInstitute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
David CunninghamDepartment of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton SM2 5PT, UK.
Alan AnthoneyDepartment of Oncology, St. James's Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK.
Anthony MaraveyasDepartment of Oncology, Castle Hill Hospital, Hull HU16 5JQ, UK.
Srinivasan MadhusudanDepartment of Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Tim IvesonDepartment of Oncology, Southampton University Hospitals, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
Juan ValleThe University of Manchester, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
Harpreet WasanHammersmith Hospital, London W12 0HS, UK.
Hammersmith Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Liverpool · GBCastle Hill Hospital · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBSt James's University Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15953Cancer Research UK C444/A15953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ABC-02 (Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer) study established cisplatin and gemcitabine (CisGem) as the standard first-line chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC). We examine quality of life (QoL), describe the long-term survivors and provide a long-term outcome.

methodsA total of 410 BTC patients were randomised to receive either CisGem or gemcitabine alone (Gem); 324 patients consented to complete EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PAN26 QoL questionnaires; 268 (83%) patients returned at least one QoL questionnaire (134 in each arm). Long-term survivors were defined as those surviving over 2 years and we performed a final analysis of the primary outcome; overall survival (OS).

resultsMost QoL scales showed a trend favouring the combined CisGem arm, including functional and symptomatic scales, although the differences were not statistically significant. Forty-five (11%)) patients survived at least 2 years (34 received CisGem and 11 Gem) and 21 (5%) 3 years or more (14 received CisGem and 7 Gem). After a median follow-up of 9.2 months and 398 deaths, the median OS was 11.7 months for CisGem and 8.1 months for Gem (hazard ratio (HR)=0.65, 95% CI: 0.53-0.79, P<0.001).

conclusionsThe survival advantage of CisGem compared to Gem was not associated with an improvement or deterioration of QoL. Long-term survivors were more likely to have received CisGem and the long-term OS is identical to that previously described.

Indexed as

Biliary Tract NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleQuality of LifeSurvivorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27115567
PMCPMC4984909
OpenAlexW2344147562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.