Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27115519›Full record

ArticleGenetica2016

Meiotic recombination analysis in female ducks (Anas platyrhynchos).

M I Pigozzi, L Del Priore

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M I PigozziINBIOMED-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UBA, CONICET, Facultad de Medicina (UBA), Paraguay 2155, Piso 10, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina. mpigozzi@fmed.uba.ar.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3105-0073
L Del PrioreINBIOMED-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, UBA, CONICET, Facultad de Medicina (UBA), Paraguay 2155, Piso 10, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic recombination in female ducks was directly studied by immunolocalization of MLH1 protein, a mismatch repair protein of mature recombination nodules. In total, 6820 crossovers were scored along the autosomal synaptonemal complexes in 122 meiotic nuclei. From this analysis we predict that the female map length of the duck is 2845 cM, with a genome wide recombination rate of 2 cM/Mb. MLH1-focus mapping along the six largest bivalents shows regional variations of recombination frequencies that can be linked to differences in chromosome morphology. From this MLH1 mapping it can be inferred that distally located markers will appear more separated in genetic maps than physically equidistant markers located near the centromeres on bivalents 1 and 2. Instead, markers at interstitial positions on the acrocentric bivalents 3-6 will appear more tightly linked than expected on the basis of their physical distance because recombination is comparatively lower at the mid region of these chromosomes. The present results provide useful information to complement linkage mapping in ducks and extend previous knowledge about the variation of recombination rates among domestic Galloanserae.

Indexed as

Recombination, GeneticAnimalsChromosome MappingChromosomesCrossing Over, GeneticDucksFemaleGenetic LinkageGenomeMeiosisMutL Protein Homolog 1Pachytene StageSynaptonemal ComplexMutL Protein Homolog 1Anas platyrhynchosBirdsCrossing overMeiosisMLH1 foci

Identifiers

PMID27115519
OpenAlexW2345249655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.