Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27115418›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2016

To Revascularise or Not To Revascularise, That Is the Question: the Diagnostic and Management Conundrum of Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy.

Natalia Briceno, Divaka Perera

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The Role of Troponin for Acute Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia BricenoBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Cardiovascular Division, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, Kings College London, London, UK.
Divaka PereraBritish Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence and National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Cardiovascular Division, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, Kings College London, London, UK. divaka.perera@kcl.ac.uk.
British Heart Foundation · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/57/67
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischaemic cardiomyopathy is an important cardiovascular condition that has differing pathophysiological substrates and clinical manifestations. Contemporary management involves the administration of heart failure pharmacotherapy and device therapy where indicated, which has good prognostic data to support it. Whilst the role of revascularisation is clear in those patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome or angina, the role in those patients presenting either incidentally, with predominant heart failure symptoms, or in those presenting with acute heart failure with an associated elevated troponin is less well defined and lacks randomised outcome data to support its adoption. The aim of this review is therefore to discuss the challenges in the diagnosis of ischaemic cardiomyopathy with a review of the existing imaging modalities that can facilitate, and to revisit the variety of clinical presentations that can occur, with particular emphasis on the contemporary role of revascularisation in these cohorts of patients.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyHumansMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial RevascularizationPractice Guidelines as TopicPrecision MedicineSeverity of Illness IndexVentricular Dysfunction, LeftIschaemiaIschaemic cardiomyopathyRevascularisationViability

Identifiers

PMID27115418
PMCPMC4846708
OpenAlexW2344026362

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.