Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27115350›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Cervical Microbiome and Cytokine Profile at Various Stages of Cervical Cancer: A Pilot Study.

Astride Audirac-Chalifour, Kirvis Torres-Poveda, Margarita Bahena-Román, Juan Téllez-Sosa, Jesús Martínez-Barnetche, Bernardo Cortina-Ceballos, Guillermina López-Estrada, Karina Delgado-Romero, Ana I Burguete-García, David Cantú and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 251 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
251citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

251 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. The Human Microbiome in Relation to Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review of Epidemiologic Studies.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

191 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Astride Audirac-ChalifourDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Kirvis Torres-PovedaDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Margarita Bahena-RománDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Juan Téllez-SosaDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Jesús Martínez-BarnetcheDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Bernardo Cortina-CeballosDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Guillermina López-EstradaPrivate Health Center for Gynecology, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
Karina Delgado-RomeroCentro de Atención para la Salud de la Mujer (CAPASAM) (Center for Women's Health), Health Services of the State of Morelos, Cuernavaca, Mexico.
Ana I Burguete-GarcíaDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.
David CantúDivision of Clinical Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), SS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Alejandro García-CarrancáDivision of Basic Research, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), SS, Mexico City, Mexico.
Vicente Madrid-MarinaDirección de Infecciones Crónicas y Cáncer, Centro de Investigación sobre Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP) (Chronic Infectious Diseases and Cancer Division, Center for Research on Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Public Health), Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is caused by high-risk human papillomavirus persistence due to the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment mediated by cytokines. Vaginal microbiota determines the presence of certain cytokines locally. We assessed the association between cervical microbiota diversity and the histopathological diagnosis of each stage of CC, and we evaluated mRNA cervical expression levels of IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, TGF-β1, TNF-α and IFN-γ across the histopathological diagnosis and specific bacterial clusters. We determined the cervical microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons and classified it in community state types (CST). Mean difference analyses between alpha-diversity and histopathological diagnosis were carried out, as well as a β-diversity analysis within the histological diagnosis. Cervical cytokine mRNA expression was analyzed across the CSTs and the histopathological diagnoses. We found a significant difference in microbiota's diversity in NCL-HPV negative women vs those with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SIL) and CC(p = 0.006, p = 0.036).When β-diversity was evaluated, the CC samples showed the highest variation within groups (p<0.0006) and the largest distance compared to NCL-HPV negative ones (p<0.00001). The predominant bacteria in women with normal cytology were L. crispatus and L. iners, whereas for SIL, it was Sneathia spp. and for CC, Fusobacterium spp. We found higher median cervical levels of IL-4 and TGF-β1 mRNA in the CST dominated by Fusobacterium spp. These results suggest that the cervical microbiota may be implicated in cervical cancer pathology. Further cohort studies are needed to validate these findings.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAdultCarcinoma, Squamous CellCross-Sectional StudiesCytokinesFemaleHumansInterferon-gammaInterleukin-10Interleukin-4Interleukin-6Middle AgedNeoplasm StagingRNA, MessengerRNA, NeoplasmSquamous Intraepithelial Lesions of the CervixCytokinesIFNG protein, humanIL10 protein, humanIL4 protein, humanIL6 protein, humanInterferon-gammaInterleukin-10Interleukin-4Interleukin-6RNA, MessengerRNA, NeoplasmTGFB1 protein, humanTransforming Growth Factor beta1Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID27115350
PMCPMC4846060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.